Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Van de Beek was creative at Ajax but I did compare him to Klaassen and got some pelters for it. He's better than Klaassen but he needs to play in a certain role to be creative really.He hasn’t contributed much in the minutes he has played though has he? We were desperate for a holding midfielder and some creativity, and we managed to sign two players who offered neither.
Tell me about it all these transfer expert dweebs think they know the answers to our squad issuesThe transfer thread virgins. The biggest toxicity at this club, much more damaging to the club than, say, Kenwright.
We’re not scoring enough goals from midfield.
Why are people acting like he’s rubbish?
He was really good for a few games, got stuck in, carried and passed the ball really well and then got injured.
When Mina is injured his legend of being the best cb grows week by week but VDB being out has meant he’s crap and a coward?
Just because we lost against Southampton, City and Wolves doesn’t mean he didn’t look like a good player.One game.
Just because we lost against Southampton, City and Wolves doesn’t mean he didn’t look like a good player.
Obviously he was great against Leeds but I thought he was excellent against City.
Basically, he looked bright, everyone was being positive, now he’s missed a few games and most are saying he was rubbish and alluding to him faking an injury because Ten Hag will want to play him ?
Tell them!Tell me about it all these transfer expert dweebs think they know the answers to our squad issues
I thought he was good in the first half versus Leeds, didn’t see any of that excellence against City, seen him shout for the ball in other games and also saw him hide in those games, I bet Man. Unt. can’t hide their excitement with the news he will playing for them next season. Another signing on fee and big wages wasted again by Everton as we look back on the “ Good times” that Billy Boy reminded us of.Just because we lost against Southampton, City and Wolves doesn’t mean he didn’t look like a good player.
Obviously he was great against Leeds but I thought he was excellent against City.
Basically, he looked bright, everyone was being positive, now he’s missed a few games and most are saying he was rubbish and alluding to him faking an injury because Ten Hag will want to play him ?
Think this is spot on, got his eye on Ten Haag for Utd and I guess for him, knowing Ten Haag, makes sense.After the Leeds and City games, I had high hopes for him, but it appears that he's unlikely to play for us again. As a loan player, is he going to be committed?
@GrandOldTeam said something similar too when his new injury was first reported. We might be doing him a disservice, but it’s plausible at least.Think this is spot on, got his eye on Ten Haag for Utd and I guess for him, knowing Ten Haag, makes sense.
Makes sense for him basically. Can't disagree with your comment, it's just another player we have 'signed', in a long list of players, who have been not a lot of use to us.Think this is spot on, got his eye on Ten Haag for Utd and I guess for him, knowing Ten Haag, makes sense.