Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What makes you sure that the £15mil would have been put to better use? This is Everton, it would have gone on another high-earning wastrel, or just straight in Bill's back pocket ?I was trying to think of a good example - Dobbin is obviously a different profile - Dowell seems about right.
No idea how much worse we'd be, we definitely wouldn't be any better. But that 15m could have been put to better use.
He cost £15 million,
So he cost 20m
No, he was £15 million.
He's an embarrassment to the shirt
He's let me down. Looked promising up to his poor season last year.
All the good things have disappeared over 18months.
Need to move him on pronto.
1 assist all season is not promising. A forward with no pace, one footed and lack of ability is not promising. All these are obvious before we sign him.
I’m not sure why you insist on bringing up old stats and refuse to come to conclusion he is really crap in the season before we signed him. It’s incredibly obvious he is not good enough.18/19 3 gosls 5 assists
19/20 2 goals 6 assists
20/21 2 goals 5 assists
I'm not sure whats challenging for you about these premier league stats in a negative low table side.
As i correctly stated, up to 18 months ago he looked promising.
Somethings happened to him as hes been a different player for 18 months.
I’m not sure why you insist on bringing up old stats and refuse to come to conclusion he is really crap in the season before we signed him. It’s incredibly obvious he is not good enough.
I think Zat means to say that Burnley weren't getting many goals to begin with, so his involvement of 10 or so a season combined is actually pretty good.I’m not sure why you insist on bringing up old stats and refuse to come to conclusion he is really crap in the season before we signed him. It’s incredibly obvious he is not good enough.
I think Zat means to say that Burnley weren't getting many goals to begin with, so his involvement of 10 or so a season combined is actually pretty good.
I think?
I'd agree with that tbh - in a poor side consistency is a good thing (see Richarlison) but in reality he's let us all down this year.
Because people who tell you it’s a great buy when it happens, have to still back their corner when it’s obvious to everyone else he’s a poor player and it was bad signing. Just like gray was, but people again will say for 1.7mil it’s a good buy. I Couldn’t careless if he cost £1:70 or 17mil he’s a relegation fodder journeymen as is Townsend as is doucoure as is Maupay as is McNeil etc.I’m not sure why you insist on bringing up old stats and refuse to come to conclusion he is really crap in the season before we signed him. It’s incredibly obvious he is not good enough.
I mean Zat's literally saying he was wrong there, nothing to do with backing into a corner lolBecause people who tell you it’s a great buy when it happens, have to still back their corner when it’s obvious to everyone else he’s a poor player and it was bad signing. Just like gray was, but people again will say for 1.7mil it’s a good buy. I Couldn’t careless if he cost £1:70 or 17mil he’s a relegation fodder journeymen as is Townsend as is doucoure as is Maupay as is McNeil etc.
You buy poor players there’s only one
Place you’re going