ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC" part 2

[Saint Domingo]

Great day in work winding the Kopites up about that City/Spurs game,sooooooooooo easylollollol

It’s bizarre that the result is probably the worst one imaginable for their title challenge yet because they are obsessed with any other team that takes media attention away from them they’re all made up with it. That was the best Spurs had to throw at them and they still lost the game. That doesn’t bode well for the weekend when Spurs have even less incentive and City arguably more. If City win that they’re 90 minutes against a shambles of a United side from Liverpool looking at a two legged tie v Barca as their only trophy opportunity left. Yet they’re all made up. Bizarre.

 

[Baileyjon]

"Football accounting" lollollollol

You think football accounting has it own laws? You can't write comedy like this.

If you sell an intangible asset do you receive income?

RAWK has made you giddy, thinking you could finally get one over the mighty Steve0 but you've just embarrassed yourself.

Next year though.

Right thanks for the amusement but that's all for tonight. Come back again though you mentalist, I think I love you a little bit.

We aren't talking about accounting laws we are talking about accounting practices, you really should know that. I will ask you again are you still stating that player trading is part of turnover. If you are please explain why Clubs do not include it in their audited accounts.

 

[TheBrace]

You do Steve and you have admitted as such on this very forum.


View attachment 57071

Sorry mate but taken in context its kind of blatantly obvious it was a joke.

I mean if you don't see it you dont see it but i think you're in the minority.

I’ve looked at it and went a few pages back too so I can see the ‘context’ and I don’t see it. At all. It was just that statement, straight out of nowhere. You’ve been caught out and are now saying it was a joke. Was the post above it a ‘Joke’ too? You’re right on one count though. You are quite the oddball.

 

[Wayno]

Absolutely zero chance baileyjon isn’t on the register

 

[PITA]

@Steve0 they are posts of you including the Coutinho fee in their £465 million turnover.

I and a few others explained to you that Turnover total was Tv, Matchday and Commercial.

Easy to do with the search bar and using certain words in finding said posts.

Anyway i already explained to someone in a post a few pages away that transfer fees are seperate from the turnover tally, as fees are amortisised over a set period of the said contracts and classed in another part of the balance sheet.

You an accountant?

 

[Baileyjon]

Absolutely zero chance baileyjon isn’t on the register

Which register is this Wayno ?

 

[Pete_Beno]

You've used the term RS a few times.

Definite attempt to be covert but you people always let the smoke bomb out of the bag eventually.

Some credit for admitting it now though. So kudos for that.

Just sticking with the vernacular, la.

 

[4737carlin]

 

[brigadier]

They hate Warnock, a manager who they hate because he stood up to them, he's got previous with them , if I could hand pick anyone to derail them it's him. His post match would be pulis x 1000.

 

[Yarrgh]

Call in Rentokill. This thread is infested.

 

[summerisle]

And the train keeps a rollin' :

 

[Steve0]

We aren't talking about accounting laws we are talking about accounting practices, you really should know that. I will ask you again are you still stating that player trading is part of turnover. If you are please explain why Clubs do not include it in their audited accounts.

They do include it.

I need you to give me a definition of turnover before we can go further.

I need to know what you think this term means.

 

[Steve0]

I’ve looked at it and went a few pages back too so I can see the ‘context’ and I don’t see it. At all. It was just that statement, straight out of nowhere. You’ve been caught out and are now saying it was a joke. Was the post above it a ‘Joke’ too? You’re right on one count though. You are quite the oddball.

The Duke of Marmite (jesus) was another oddball red who got an account on here to pretend to be a blue.

I was mocking him.

And all other reds who've done the same. They're odd arent they.

 

[Baileyjon]

They do include it.

I need you to give me a definition of turnover before we can go further.

I need to know what you think this term means.

Again from our last accounts.



There it is in black and white what a club's turnover consists of. The screen shot is from our audited accounts registered with companies house. Player sales go on the balance sheet but are not part of the clubs income.

Surely the mighty Steve0 can understand that.

 

[canuckblue]

Moomin, SteveO is one of the worst posters on this forum by a country mile. I pull him up and get accused of being RS for it. Nothing to do with that all, its him and his BS. Quite refreshing to hear a fellow blue having the same opinion.

You do realize Moomin was joking. Please tell me you're not that obtuse. On second thought, don't bother. You are. Just like the rest of the lurkers on here.