I mean the knobhead is holding his right shin when it was his left toe that was breathed on. Surely Joe who works for VAR in Brighton can see that he's conning the ref and csn tell the ref he's diving so book him for simulation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a very soft penalty - I just saw it on MOTD. I also think the Leicester player being bundled over in the first half was a penalty though.
What was the kerfuffle at the end of the game about?
I love the way that was a rule for about 2 weeks and now just doesn't exist at all.
So say the same thing had happened at the other end, and a Leicester player had gone to ground easily.... The ref would have waived play on... VAR would have looked at it.. Do you think the VAR officials would have ruled that the ref had made a 'clear and obvious error'??....
Nope...
And that's where VAR has been set up to allow the normal bias to big clubs, and Liverpool in particular...
The ref will always award Liverpool penos, and as long as there's slight contact (even if the player dives), VAR will back his decision
Arguably the biggest and most prominent interceptions where VAR has overturned decisions, have been to the detriment of the last two league champions, City and Chelsea - who are owned by Sheikh’s and Russian billionaires
If there was a conspiracy in favour of the top clubs - surely those decisions wouldn’t have occurred.
It was a pen in my opinion. Albrighton was clumsy and there was contact, nobody is really arguing that. The contact wasn’t sufficient to make him go down, so he’s certainly guilty of exaggerating that contact.
However, if he doesn’t go down, the ref doesn’t have a decision to make. The FA actively encourage this behaviour, rather than players staying on their feet, because i’m yet to see a ref give a penalty when there has been no claim. It’s not something exclusive to that lot, it’s fairly commonplace now.
It’s just typical that it had to occur in the last seconds yet again.
Arguably the biggest and most prominent interceptions where VAR has overturned decisions, have been to the detriment of the last two league champions, City and Chelsea - who are owned by Sheikh’s and Russian billionaires
If there was a conspiracy in favour of the top clubs - surely those decisions wouldn’t have occurred.
It isn't a peno in a million years, please stop trying to make that decision acceptable....there's contact yes, but there's NO FOUL.... Mane has cheated, clear and simple.
City and Chelsea have never been liked by the FA/Premier league officials, City in particular because they're Liverpools rival, don't get biased decisions like Liverpool and Man United have over the years.... Liverpool got everything last season, and are getting everything this year...
Pact with the devil.Look at the expression on his face as he goes to ground, the tackle was not so severe as to merit looking like he'd just been branded with an iron.
Glad someone else like you is keen to highlight the unnatural fitness levels that they seem to enjoy. They start with 11 from the same pool of 13 or 14 players game in, game out. They run around like lunatics and are ready to go again less than three days later. They are able to do this for months at a time and have done so without any significant injuries to key players for more than two years. Other clubs regularly lose players to soft tissue injuries but not the RS. Even when you see them leave the field gingerly they're back the next game.
How do they do it?
I'm simply not interested in pro football any more.VAR is there to enhance big club bias. There is an overriding need to protect the product; RS, Mans U & C, Perm any two from Spurs, Arse, Chelsea. The remainder are extras or plucky new bees.
THE PREMIER LEAGUE IS BENT. WAKE UP!
Hmmm....Hamza Choudhury getting racist abuse online. Stirred up by Klopp, no doubt.
Rumours that he (Robertson) called Perez something that Hispanic people deem racist. Not sure if its true but he looked incensed by somethingIt was a very soft penalty - I just saw it on MOTD. I also think the Leicester player being bundled over in the first half was a penalty though.
What was the kerfuffle at the end of the game about?