"If' they and others are up to any performance enhancing therapies it will be something outside of the scope of current testing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't there a way to detect a pact with the Devil?"If' they and others are up to any performance enhancing therapies it will be something
outside of the scope of current testing
The first one of the other teams being rubbish is the most likely cause of their success. But I still can't explain how better teams than them, who were packed with quality from front to back didn't destroy teams. If VVD and Mane got injured would they be as great as they are are now? I doubt it. Also you can't deny they have been incredibly lucky this season. Ings missing a sitter, goalies dropping the ball twice in 1 week , dodgy penalty against Leicester and a foul in the build up to their second goal against Chelsea. I think all the decisions they've got over the years and luck makes you think Everton fans did something wrong in a previous life. Couldn't make it up, for us to lose, they win in the 95th minute and City lose in 1 weekend. When you see Clattenburg about to give Hibbert and yellow, only for Gerrard to walk past and he suddenly gives him a red. Then for Kuyt not to be sent off for a waist high launching karate kick, towards Phil Neville. Then for Carragher to assault Lescott in the penalty box and not get a penalty you start to believe in conspiracy theories.
It's estimated that 70% of athletes competing at any given event are on PEDs. Drug testing rarely finds a positive sample. Most findings and banning come from a whistle blower coming forward.
Drug testers can only find what they are specifically looking for and will only find a positive sample if someone has been very sloppy.
To think the sport with the most money involved won't have similar problems with cheating as all.other sports is naive.
Thats a cop out and a loop hole that dopers have used for years. Microdosing is very effective when done correctly. Not if you have a race you want to win in two weeks time but to help you sustain a raised level of performance to increase your capacity to train or build muscle over a period of time. If it didnt work it would be done.As I say, testing has moved on from the binary pass/fail and is now based on the relationship between blood markers. The testers don't need to know the product used, only that the athlete's blood is doing stuff that can't be explained by medical statistics as natural.
I have no problem believing there is doping in football. I have a problem believing it is a deciding factor in games for a number of reasons... Firstly, not every one responds equally to PEDs, for example if your natural red blood cell count is already in the 43-45% bracket, you aren't going to gain as much as somebody in the 40%-42% bracket from jacking it up. In team sports, this tends to even out the effect of blood vector doping.
Secondly, the manner of detection now means that regular high doses are simply not an option any more. You will be busted in months. Thus, if you want to do it you are relying on microdosing which isn't going to give you anything like the effects.
Finally, if one Premier League team are doing it... They are definitely all doing it to some degree. Do you believe that literally every single player, coach, doctor, trainer etc would have shut up about it forever and ever and nothing would have leaked out? Teams would have to be insane to orchestrate it themselves (as Juve did in the 90s). I believe any players doping are doing it on a freelance basis.
This of course still leaves scope for teams to indulge in the gray areas of what is legal and what isn't. All elite sports do this. My attitude is basically, if it isnt on the list, it isn't doping.
Thats a cop out and a loop hole that dopers have used for years. Microdosing is very effective when done correctly. Not if you have a race you want to win in two weeks time but to help you sustain a raised level of performance to increase your capacity to train or build muscle over a period of time. If it didnt work it would be done.
Most athletes, not just footballers, have no idea what supplements they take. The whistle blowers come from inside the labs and usually are not well received. Poor auld Grigory Rodchenkov can testify to that.
'In Jersey anything's legal as long as you don't get caught' - Tweeter and the Monkey Man; Bob Dylan.As I say, testing has moved on from the binary pass/fail and is now based on the relationship between blood markers. The testers don't need to know the product used, only that the athlete's blood is doing stuff that can't be explained by medical statistics as natural.
I have no problem believing there is doping in football. I have a problem believing it is a deciding factor in games for a number of reasons... Firstly, not every one responds equally to PEDs, for example if your natural red blood cell count is already in the 43-45% bracket, you aren't going to gain as much as somebody in the 40%-42% bracket from jacking it up. In team sports, this tends to even out the effect of blood vector doping.
Secondly, the manner of detection now means that regular high doses are simply not an option any more. You will be busted in months. Thus, if you want to do it you are relying on microdosing which isn't going to give you anything like the effects.
Finally, if one Premier League team are doing it... They are definitely all doing it to some degree. Do you believe that literally every single player, coach, doctor, trainer etc would have shut up about it forever and ever and nothing would have leaked out? Teams would have to be insane to orchestrate it themselves (as Juve did in the 90s). I believe any players doping are doing it on a freelance basis.
This of course still leaves scope for teams to indulge in the gray areas of what is legal and what isn't. All elite sports do this. My attitude is basically, if it isnt on the list, it isn't doping.