witchdoc187
Player Valuation: £60m
Because despite their "success" they want to be us.Why is a Liverpool fan arguing with a City fan on an Everton forum lol
Go outside
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because despite their "success" they want to be us.Why is a Liverpool fan arguing with a City fan on an Everton forum lol
Go outside
How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.We are self sustaining. I don't care that you don't believe me.
So so bitter.How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
You’ve got a lot to say for someone who went missing for so long after your quad fell apart.How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
Definitely. He always seems fit as well (injury wise, not the peds!)Mane is going to be a huge loss. He does so much more besides scoring. The telling interceptions and challenges he makes high up the pitch has opponents constantly on their heels.
He's going to be a £200M loss and I cant believe that FSG are allowing his departure and not offering him a massive deal to keep him there.
Stop it mert, you’re gonna give yourself an ulcer or heart attack getting so bitter and wound up by city and how clever/good they are at the moment - just accept their brilliance and you will feel better kid.How can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
Salty and bitter with a hint of vindictiveness. Definitely a vintage 2022 RSHow can you be self sustaining mate when you have £200 milion of commercial deals where up to June 2022 have 14 commercial deals all linked to Mansour and Abu Dhabi royal family, and of those 14 commercial deals owned by your owner and his family, your chairman of your club khaldoon is chairman of the board of 13 of those companies that sponsor your club, your club added 8 of those 14 companies in January and February.
Of your commercial revenues in your last turnover you had £270 odd milion, with the addition of those 8 owner linked companies your commercial revenues will be closer to £350 million in next year's turnover results.
The ones we know of are Puma at £65 milion a year, Nexus tires at £9 milion a year and Etihad deal reported at the CAS trial being £140 milion a year from 2018 onwards, when you told UEFA in 2014 after your first ffp violations was a 10 year contract £400 milion contract at £40 million a year that somehow a airline thats had the biggest losses in aviation history has averaged losing $2 billion per year since 2013 can find money to sponsor a football club at £140 million per year as reported at the CAS trial that two years after inking that Etihad deal that it got doubled to £80 milion and 2018 to £140 milion, amazing a ten year contract at 400 million is actually really closer to 1.2 billion over 10 years, guess that can happen when your owner owns the airline.
When your owners don't sponsor your club with multiple commercial deals that prop up your turnover then you can tell us all what a fantastic self sustaining club you are, but using it willingly when you have 14 companies in your commercial portfolio that are all connected to TWO investment vehicles of the Abu Dhabi investment Authority and Mubadala Investment Fund then it's just laughable AF.
Definition of self-sustaining
Maintaining or able to maintain oneself or itself by independent effort.
But they do win most of their games.I disagree mate. The trophy haul just isn't there for them. Last 20 years 8 trophies...only 3 being the big ones of the PL or CL.
They are an elite club because the media tells us they are. They simply haven't been at the races in terms of success compared to United, City and Chelsea in the last 2 decades.
HK, a bit of advice mate. Remember what you're here for: some light trolling on an Everton forum.
Being able to recite Manchester City's commercial revenue streams and getting visibly salty about them with a City fan is quite disturbing and sad. I don't want to see you hurt or banned again, and I certainly don't want you PMing me when you reach breaking point again
FA Cup? Caramac Cup? Salty? Bitter?Salty and bitter with a hint of vindictiveness. Definitely a vintage 2022 RS