Do you therefore accept that Everton's last trophy was in 1998, not 1995? Do you accept that Arsenal have won 28 league titles? Just to be clear - are you saying that major honours lists of clubs should include female team honours as indistinguishable from male?
You're throwing in a completely different aspect here, which is totally underpinned by trying to draw false equivalance to suit a misogynist view.
With regards to Everton, the male's last trophy is 1995 whereas the female's is 2010 as they won the Women's FA Cup. As a wider club, I'd go with the latter.
The caveat here is that while talking about Everton most people will still subconsciously associate with the male game due to no fault of their (women's) own.
Everton FC male's team have won nine league trophies, but overtime I do think the women's honours will be mentioned too. They could be amalgamated.
Right now, however, the distinction between the two is still made. When it came to England, I think rightfully the boundary between the two was removed.
With regards to England, the male's last trophy is 1966 whereas the female's was two weeks ago. As a wider nation, I'd go definitely with the latter.
Put it into another context, you could ask when did Britain last win a curling gold medal, with the answer being 2022. But that was the women, not the men.
Have GB won a medal though? Yes, so unless you're specifically prioritising one gender over the other it shouldn't be an issue at all.
Have England ended their weight for a top football trophy? Yes, that's it. Maybe the fact they were banned for decades plays a part in why their separated.
