• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Why would Suarez "pinch" his arm?

His whole evidence looks farcical. There was no need for him to be pushing/pinching his arm. If he was trying to push someone why not push their body (chest/ stomach / waist).

His dodgy inconsistent evidence to me shows he's trying to hide something.
 
That is an outrageously funny disclosure.

Their goose is cooked. There's no way an appeal can be successful without the FA looking like utter fools.
 

Dalglish gets pulled into the refs dressing room about this. His first comment off the bat re Evra:

"Hasn't he done this before?".

Classy.
 

Liverpool were using a supposed 'equivalent' tit-for-tat exchange between Evra and Suarez as their defence: Evra called Suarez a south American; Suarez called Evra negro.

Regardless of the iffy sequence of events that puts Evra getting his dig in first (implausible to say the least) it's not exactly moral equivalents like is it? Suarez's commensurate response would have been 'French', not what skin colour Evra is.

Suarez has gone for the N-bomb and now has less than he should have got in terms of a ban.

Those Kopites - if they had any dignity and sense - would do well to belt up about this now.
 
Liverpool's press officers have dug his grave.

They put it out that he said "negrito" which is a supposed term of endearment, when in fact he said "negro" which is nothing of the sort.

Similarly they alleged Evra called Suarez a "sudaca", a slur on South Americans when in actual fact he is ACCUSED of saying "Sudamericano" which simply means South American and according to the Spanish language experts brought in has never been used as a short hand offensive slur. (Paragraph 362)

They've basically created their own evidence to get into the media before anyone could see the facts and it hasn't worked.
 
Liverpool were using a supposed 'equivalent' tit-for-tat exchange between Evra and Suarez as their defence: Evra called Suarez a south American; Suarez called Evra negro.

Regardless of the iffy sequence of events that puts Evra getting his dig in first (implausible to say the least) it's not exactly moral equivalents like is it? Suarez's commensurate response would have been 'French', not what skin colour Evra is.

Suarez has gone for the N-bomb and now has less than he should have got in terms of a ban.

Those Kopites - if they had any dignity and sense - would do well to belt up about this now.

It a classic "devisionary" defence. Trying to create moral equivalence.

Its as bad as a rapist trying to say "she was asking for it".


There is absolutely a sense on reading this that this was purely Suarez trying to incite/provoke a reaction out of Evra to have him sent off. Which wasn't working so he took it to the next level. Which was racist abuse.

Then there was a conspiracy at Liverpool to try and cover it up / excuse it based on very flimsy excuses.
 
Liverpool's press officers have dug his grave.

They put it out that he said "negrito" which is a supposed term of endearment, when in fact he said "negro" which is nothing of the sort.

Similarly they alleged Evra called Suarez a "sudaca", a slur on South Americans when in actual fact he is ACCUSED of saying "Sudamericano" which simply means South American and according to the Spanish language experts brought in has never been used as a short hand offensive slur. (Paragraph 362)

They've basically created their own evidence to get into the media before anyone could see the facts and it hasn't worked.

It is truly damning indictment of what LFC have been spinning over the past few weeks really.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top