• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Whether he is mince or not, (I happen to think he is ok as it happens), he scored quite a few for them, so I cant really see what Southampton get out of this. £4m is loose change these days, especially if they get gazillions for Shaw, Lalanna, etc.

One lad said something about being part of a Lalanna deal, which might be true, but selling one of your top goal scorers for buttons seems odd.
Also doesn't say much about Lambert if he's happy to be a makeweight
 
Right, not read the last few pages.... Kopite I've been talking to tells me that the bid they have made is a triple bit for lambert, lovran, lallana.... The reason lambert is 9 mil is to knock down lallanas price so they have to pay Bournemouth less on a 20%?sell on fee.... I don't know how true that is.
 
Right, not read the last few pages.... Kopite I've been talking to tells me that the bid they have made is a triple bit for lambert, lovran, lallana.... The reason lambert is 9 mil is to knock down lallanas price so they have to pay Bournemouth less on a 20%?sell on fee.... I don't know how true that is.

That would make sense to be fair, if they made a triple bid.
 
Right, not read the last few pages.... Kopite I've been talking to tells me that the bid they have made is a triple bit for lambert, lovran, lallana.... The reason lambert is 9 mil is to knock down lallanas price so they have to pay Bournemouth less on a 20%?sell on fee.... I don't know how true that is.

i'm not saying BBC is a reputable source but they only have a story about lambert there (haven't actually opened it so it may mention the other two but reckon that would have been in the title), all these rumours about other players being involved seem to be coming from kopites, probably because they don't want to believe the realisation that they're getting the worst of the three hopefuls you mentioned there.

when a team is linked to a player and then later get linked to another player from that club, there's always some source that seems to think both transfers are then related.
 

Right, not read the last few pages.... Kopite I've been talking to tells me that the bid they have made is a triple bit for lambert, lovran, lallana.... The reason lambert is 9 mil is to knock down lallanas price so they have to pay Bournemouth less on a 20%?sell on fee.... I don't know how true that is.

I get that, but what if spurs now offer more money for lallana? Don't understand why it isn't a double bid straight away?
 
Right, not read the last few pages.... Kopite I've been talking to tells me that the bid they have made is a triple bit for lambert, lovran, lallana.... The reason lambert is 9 mil is to knock down lallanas price so they have to pay Bournemouth less on a 20%?sell on fee.... I don't know how true that is.
Hahaha my Kopite mate has said exactly the same thing apart from he said the sell on fee was 25%.
 
I get that, but what if spurs now offer more money for lallana? Don't understand why it isn't a double bid straight away?

haha can you imagine that, saints agreeing to an inflated fee for lambert, get all the paperwork signed and sealed, then say sorry, we've got a better bid for lallana from spurs, bye.



p.s. here's your new £10m 32 year old striker
 

Only saying what I've been told lads .... I've not even switched sky sports on to hear this story .... It'll all come out in the wash as they say.

wasn't having a go at you, just all these reports seem to be coming from them in a sort of desperate way of thinking now that spurs have shown an interest.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top