RED
Player Valuation: £950k
LOL it's ok. I got it. I've said my piece. As you were.identical isn't double old boy, no matter how much you RAWK the figures
LOL it's ok. I got it. I've said my piece. As you were.identical isn't double old boy, no matter how much you RAWK the figures
your piece was wrong, please retract your statement and apologise to goatLOL it's ok. I got it. I've said my piece. As you were.
Goat, I apologise that catcherintherye was talking out of his arse. Thanks for your help in clearing it up.your piece was wrong, please retract your statement and apologise to goat
Where's the cheese and pineapple money bill?Yer mars cheese & pineapple on grand old toast lid is cutting edge ffs..
You murdering get. Yes YOU.Goat, I apologise that catcherintherye was talking out of his arse. Thanks for your help in clearing it up.
You murdering get. Yes YOU.
He played for Real Madrid.. Still wasn't considered a top drawer player.If Gravesen had played for a regular top four team then he would be considered a top drawer player!
Come on now mate. He was a very good player for us when he wanted to be, but way too inconsistent to play for one of the top clubs
What is this based on? One of them has a goals per game ratio that is double the other's.
He'll just blame the length of the grass, or Roy Hodgson, or those players that aren't in 'the group'. Then he'll blather on about having no money for a bit and the kopites will lap it up. They are in 7th and loving it, the man is a miracle worker!
NO M8 EEZ BUILDIN A DYYYYYNASTEEEE WID ALL DER YUNG PLAYAZ WEER STILL IN TWANZISHON YWAN JF96 WE GOE AFAIN
That's defo true about Alonso and Mascherano. They were just about as good as any player in Europe at what they did. If you look at Gerrard though he's never been a specialist at anything and never, therefore, excelled as a footballer. He's an all-rounder - something the English in general in sports are fascinated with but what continentals scratch their head at and see as a Jack of all trades, master of none. They see someone like Scholes as a player of note, because Scholes was the heartbeat and fulcrum for a dominant United every time he played. Someone like Gerrard, who had the odd cavalier flourish in a major game or two, wouldn't get that respect.
Spot on that. Gerrard has been a disruptive influence throughout his career. That's counter-intuitive, but it's true for the reasons you underline. Benitez got that CL win behind him early on at Anfield and then had the stature at LFC to control Gerrrard without fear of a backlash being orchestrated. That, competitively speaking, was their best spell since the 80s: realistically fighting for the CL and putting in a challenge (until Easter anyway) to a rampant United in the PL. After the strongman left, Gerrard just took control again and played wherever the **** he liked.Yes they were both a class act. For all the criticism he gets Benitez was the closest they ever came to winning things. It was dull, boring and snidey at times, complete anti-football but he knew how to sign good players. It sounds very obvious, if you have a lot of money buy proven top players and play them in a sensible system, but Rodgers completely fails at this.
It doesn't surprise me that of all the managers they had, he was the one who minimised Gerrards role the most and played him right midfield in order to accommodate the likes of Alonso and Mascherano (but also Lucas and Sissokho). Aside from a miracle performance from Cantona this is as close as they have come to winning something.
The fact that Gerrards ego forced those players out says it all. I remember a debate on talksport a few years back with Adrian Durham waffling on about how England should have built their team around Gerrard (I thought they did) and a fan rang up and said they should have built the team around Scholes. It was spot on. Building your team around a player isn't just about picking the bets player, but it's about picking someone who brings the best out of others.
Spot on that. Gerrard has been a disruptive influence throughout his career. That's counter-intuitive, but it's true for the reasons you underline. Benitez got that CL win behind him early on at Anfield and then had the stature at LFC to control Gerrrard without fear of a backlash being orchestrated. That, competitively speaking, was their best spell since the 80s: realistically fighting for the CL and putting in a challenge (until Easter anyway) to a rampant United in the PL. After the strongman left, Gerrard just took control again and played wherever the **** he liked.
Yes. Didn't the same thing happen against Chelsea in a European match too? Gerrard no doubt seizing the chance to get the problem out the door. I remember in that cup match two season's ago (I think against Oldham) at a time Gerrard was being asked to play second fiddle to Allen in midfield and work a short passing game, Liverpool fell behind and the camera's cut to the bench where Gerrard and Carragher were shaking their heads and giving daggers to Rodgers standing on the line in front of them.Only got to see that bell twisting the knife in by dramatically shaking his head when Torres was subbed vs Birmingham... playing to the gantries to get Benitez sacked