IT WAS CHELSEA
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/12/why-liverpool-and-suarez-should-sue.html
Am I getting this right? He called Suarez a negrito or negro and was found guilty by an INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of this, yet he should sue Ferguson because he rightfully stated that he racially abused his player.
I've read it again. I still don't get it. Is it semantics or am I missing something?
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/12/why-liverpool-and-suarez-should-sue.html
Am I getting this right? He called Suarez a negrito or negro and was found guilty by an INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of this, yet he should sue Ferguson because he rightfully stated that he racially abused his player.
I've read it again. I still don't get it. Is it semantics or am I missing something?
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/12/why-liverpool-and-suarez-should-sue.html
Am I getting this right? He called Suarez a negrito or negro and was found guilty by an INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of this, yet he should sue Ferguson because he rightfully stated that he racially abused his player.
I've read it again. I still don't get it. Is it semantics or am I missing something?
http://www.liverpool-kop.com/2011/12/why-liverpool-and-suarez-should-sue.html
Am I getting this right? He called Suarez a negrito or negro and was found guilty by an INDEPENDENT COMMITTEE of this, yet he should sue Ferguson because he rightfully stated that he racially abused his player.
I've read it again. I still don't get it. Is it semantics or am I missing something?
The 'witch-hunt' continues......http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/live...-to-say-poll-was-fixed-video-100252-30003989/