I think 1,3 and 4 are correct.As of now He is still innocent of all charges
He is available for selection
He is under contract
So I would say Everton are still paying him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think 1,3 and 4 are correct.As of now He is still innocent of all charges
He is available for selection
He is under contract
So I would say Everton are still paying him
I'm sorry but that's ridiculous. Gomes is a very good technical footballer . His problem is that he can't run, shoot or tackle.He's a better footballer though
For me a midfielder is even more crucial than a right back. Holgate or Godfrey covering Coleman whilst not ideal doesn’t completely destroy the team. What does ruin us is Davies coming into midfield especially if it’s due to a Docuoure injury. Allan plus Gomes/Davies is far too slow l, and Docuoure plus either of those two isn’t much better. We need another quick midfielder to take the burden off those two starters. One who is fit and available as well not like Gbamin and Delph.
United being linked with Mukiele at RB Leipzig as back up for Wan Bissaka. Exactly the sort of RB we should be after - French 23 year old, great athlete, tackles everything on his side of the pitch and contract ends in 2023 so price shouldn't be ridiculous. Perhaps not most creative but for me top requirement of RB is to defend. I suspect Rafael thinks along same lines.
…I thought Aaron’s did ok against us, certainly one of their better performers but I would like to think we could do better for less.
He's supended on full pay as per contract.I think 1,3 and 4 are correct.
He is not available for selection, we didnt name him in our squad.As of now He is still innocent of all charges
He is available for selection
He is under contract
So I would say Everton are still paying him
The Club made a CHOICE not to name him in the squad, right? As in, they could have chosen to name him, and then he could have played. As it happens I think the Club made the right choice BUT until Voldemort is arrested and formally charged there is no TECHNICAL reason why the Club was PREVENTED from naming him in the squad. (Has he been arrested and charged? I've not seen any report to that effect - happy to be corrected.)He is not available for selection, we didnt name him in our squad.
He is suspended, nobody knows if that is with or without pay, personally I think its without pay, but nobody knows either way.
The Club made a
The Club made a CHOICE not to name him in the squad, right? As in, they could have chosen to name him, and then he could have played. As it happens I think the Club made the right choice BUT until Voldemort is arrested and formally charged there is no TECHNICAL reason why the Club was PREVENTED from naming him in the squad. (Has he been arrested and charged? I've not seen any report to that effect - happy to be corrected.)
If he had been arrested and charged then he could, in theory, have been denied bail and remanded in custody, making it impossible for him to play. Or he could have been remanded on bail with conditions that would make it impossible to feature in certain fixtures ( a reporting condition, or an onerous curfew, or a requirement not to travel outside of a set radius of his normal address ).
It's a very serious allegation, and a terribly emotive one. But until he is arrested and charged, it's an allegation only. Normal employment laws don't allow an employer to refuse to pay someone's wage just because the employer chooses not to have the employee carry out his normal tasks due to an allegation of an offence. Presumption of innocence, and all that.
None of the above should be taken as an opinion as to innocence or guilt. Just an explanation as to certain aspects of the legal process.
Sigh.He's been suspended by the club mate, thus making him unavailable for selection.
Came on as sub yesterday I thinkIs AMN back out the team?
Insurance is against death not the crime whereby the person you are insuring by definition didn’t commit that crimeWhat if you insure your wife /partner from being murdered ie life insurance