Everton January transfer window 2021

[windymiller]

Odriozola would be a loan target from the Spanish giants for me.

Rapid, decent enough in defence and has something to prove ahead of the Euros.

With the Euros coming up there must be some loan opportunities out there. A RB would get a decent amount of minutes on the pitch (as would a right sided midfielder/forward), surely that's attractive to someone warming a mega-club's bench?

 

[windymiller]

Besiktas will have 100% offered a loan.
Schalke and Hertha would have offered minimal I'dmimagine
WBA maybe who are desperate and in teh EPL, with gravy jugs in charge...

Yep, Besiktas can swivvle, they'll be wanting a loan and us to pay 90% of his wages. They've robbed us once with this fella, we would be proper mugs to let them do us again. Hopefully, there's something in the stories about the other clubs.

 

[Bullens Rd]

Yep, Besiktas can swivvle, they'll be wanting a loan and us to pay 90% of his wages. They've robbed us once with this fella, we would be proper mugs to let them do us again. Hopefully, there's something in the stories about the other clubs.

As much as I want him to leave, you're right, I'd rather he stay than have us pay for him to play for those thieves.

 

[number4.]

Struggling to see how any club invests in January in the current Covid climate. Why invest in wages and fees when football looks likely to take a significant break at some stage.

Would wonder will the loan market heat up agressively.

 

[DaChunk]

Not for me

 

[mightymoyes]

I don't want to labour the point but you've just provided figures that suggest only 3 other clubs in the league are paying anything like what we are to a third choice keeper and said that it's evidence that it's normal? Leaving aside that as i already said, I don't really care whether anyone else does when talking about the context of us saying we need to trim the wage bill, it seems to just highlight that the majority of clubs in our position are not paying a third choice keeper £30k a week. It's understandable for Chelsea and United to do it because they play more games and are expecting to win trophies. For us though? As I said in the first place, an awful decision.

Anyway, I hope we don't sign any more wasters this window.

i count 11, chelsea, leicester, fulham, city, liverpool, utd, wolves, west ham, southampton, spurs and palace

 

[Bullens Rd]

Not for me

I'd give him a go. Got something to prove, new environment, playing under Carlo with some good midfielders around him. Def worth a go on loan.

 

[FTY]

Not for me

Gylfi Sigurd coming into bench his son

 

[Lanolin]

i count 11, chelsea, leicester, fulham, city, liverpool, utd, wolves, west ham, southampton, spurs and palace

Right. So you've looked at a list that has Wolves down as having TWO goalkeepers and from it you've gleaned the information that their THIRD choice goalkeeper is earning as much as ours? I mean it's a skill you've got there, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

 

[DanEFC92]

How viable would Eriksen be?

 

[matty1878]

interesting if true would take him all day over Davies

 

[DanEFC92]

interesting if true would take him all day over Davies

Not even been our worst midfielder

 

[Encoder]

Not for me

If 'La Stamp' isn't just stamp from twitter on the wind up I'll be amazed.

 

[dutchblue54]

Arnautovic anyone?

As a player he would tick the boxes. But doubt financially we would be interested. Big wages / not sure his Chinese team would loan him

 

[mightymoyes]

Right. So you've looked at a list that has Wolves down as having TWO goalkeepers and from it you've gleaned the information that their THIRD choice goalkeeper is earning as much as ours? I mean it's a skill you've got there, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

ha sorry, not sure how i got wolves on there, are you disputing the other 10 then?