Everton News

Status
Not open for further replies.
The price for Everton’s dream dockside stadium is revealed via Royal Blue Mersey

506559174.0.jpg

Toffees looking to step up their search for a new home

Everton will have to pay £20m if they want to buy the land for a potential new stadium in Liverpool’s north docks.

The Toffees are keen to press ahead with plans to build a new ground with a waterfront location one of the options on the table.

Peel Holdings, the owners of the site, haven’t publicly named their price but several sources including the Liverpool Echo say they value the land in the region of £20m.

Everton are also exploring a brownfield site at Stonebridge Cross in the Croxteth area of the city, but a prime dockside location would be the preferred choice for a vast majority of Blues.

Peel own large swathes of land in that area and have previously revealed plans for a Liverpool Water regeneration scheme, not incorporating a stadium.

However, those plans have yet to get off the ground despite planning permission being granted in 2012.

Given the reported finances at Everton’s disposal £20m does not seem like an insurmountable sum to secure such a prime location.

Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson revealed earlier this summer that Everton have the cash to fund a new stadium and could be in their new home within three years.

The supporters will no doubt be urging Farhad Moshiri and the board to pay the cash, secure the land and begin building a new home that could completely transform the club’s fortunes.


Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 
Usmanov to Everton – da ili nyet? via GrandOldTeam

Alisher-Usmanov-Russian-tycoon-150x150.jpg


Much has been said and written about Usmanov and the chances of him investing in Everton alongside his business partner Moshiri.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’ll be delighted to see him do so, but there are reasons why I don’t believe he will, and there are significant practical problems to be overcome for him to do so.

Firstly it’s probably good to look back at the history of Usmanov’s and Kroenke’s investment in Arsenal.

The story goes back to 2007 – it’s fairly lengthy but I’ll give the shortest version I can.

David Dein introduced Stan Kroenke in early 2007 believing that his money could help Arsenal be more competitive in the Premier League. Kroenke bought Granada’s shares and a few from Danny Fiszman to take his holding to around 12 %. However, the Arsenal board were not happy with Dein and he was removed from the board in April 2007.

At about the same time Usmanov started becoming interested in acquiring Arsenal shares, forming R&W Holdings with Moshiri. Dein sold all his shares (14.6%) to R&W and became their Chairman. R&W started actively buying shares in the market, acquiring 21% by May 2008. Dein then resigned from R&W thinking that by doing so there would be an improvement in Usmanov’s relationship with the then Arsenal board.

However, the Arsenal board feared an attempted takeover by Usmanov and agreed to a “lockdown” meaning they would not sell their shares to anyone other than “permitted persons” through to April 2009. There was a further agreement giving the board first option on any director sales up to October 2012.

The board invited Kroenke to join them in September prior to the lockdown period, to ensure Dein could never return. However, in December 2008, a director called Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith who owned 15.9% left the board meaning her shares were no longer subject to the lockdown – critically she never showed any interest in selling to Usmanov.

Over the next two years Kroenke acquired another 3 blocks of shares taking his holding to 28.58 % in 2010, just below the critical 30% takeover threshold. Eventually in April 2011 he had acquired 29.99%. By this time R&W had got their holdings up to 27% through acquiring non board holdings ( but not Bracewell-Smith’s though).

On April 11th 2011 Kroenke in a takeover bid acquired the board’s and Bracewell-Smith’s shares taking him to 62% (there is an interesting sub plot to this, but for another time), R&W immediately refused to sell. Since this date both Kroenke and R&W have increased their holdings when shares have become available in the market to today’s figure of 67% and 30% respectively.

As a result of the failed takeover by Kroenke, and Usmanov/Moshiri’s decision not to sell their holdings to Kroenke, there has been total deadlock between Kroenke and R&W Holdings. As is well documented R&W have no board representation and their advice to the board and Kroenke is completely ignored.

Now, looking at the present position the theory goes that Moshiri sold his R&W shares to Usmanov allowing Moshiri to acquire his initial stake in Everton through Blue Heaven Holdings in the Isle of Man. Usmanov would then dispose of R&W to join his friend and long-time business partner at Everton.

This requires careful examination.

Firstly, if indeed Usmanov wished to invest in Everton, why did he acquire 100% of R&W Holdings (30.04% of Arsenal) by buying Moshiri’s share; why didn’t Moshiri acquire R&W leaving Usmanov to come straight into Everton? Then Moshiri could dispose of R&W and join his business partner at Everton.

The biggest stumbling block for me is how does Usmanov find a buyer for his stake in Arsenal?

Several people have suggested Kroenke might be a buyer, Usmanov could find another investor, sell to his family or dispose of his shares in the open market (Arsenal being an ISDX quoted company).

Firstly, Kroenke being a buyer. Why would he do so? Why would he spend another £400 million on acquiring the remaining shares in Arsenal that would derive him no additional benefit? His current stake of 67.05% gives him effective control of the company, the board and future direction, spending plans etc. He does not have to acquire any further shares to strengthen his position.

Furthermore, Kroenke would be very much aware that by acquiring R&W’s shares in Arsenal he would then potentially face Usmanov as competition in the Premier League, competition that probably only Manchester City could compete with in future years. This would clearly not be a wise decision by Kroenke.

Finding another investor. Clearly the premier league is still attractive to investors, particularly overseas investors, but what would a buyer of 30% of Arsenal be acquiring? Well, obviously the shareholding, but as has already been demonstrated that guarantees no influence, board position nor dividends. Therefore, I have to question who would be prepared to take such a position, a minority holder in a business run by an autocrat? From my own experience very few investors would buy into such a scenario.

Could Usmanov sell or pass his shares to family members? The Premier League is very clear on this, and if he was to do so with the intent of buying into Everton then the answer is a very firm no.

Can Usmanov sell his shares in the open market? In theory yes, but this is a very impractical method of selling a large block of shares in a very illiquid market, and there’s no guarantee that he could sell all his shares, something he’d have to do in order to take directly or indirectly a significant (above 9.9%) stake in Everton.

Finally, it shouldn’t be forgotten that Usmanov has publicly stated his holdings in Arsenal are a private, non-business investment “for family members to benefit for generations to come”. It should also be remembered that culturally investor timeframes in Russia are significantly longer than those in the West.

Farhad Moshiri should not be over-looked in all of this either – this is a man that has publicly stated his commitment to Everton, has acquired 50% and has options to acquire over 75%, put funds into the club and promised significant investment in the future. Perhaps, despite his great friendship with Usmanov, and the great amount of time they reportedly spend discussing football matters, this is actually something Moshiri wants to do alone? He should be afforded the respect until such a time as Usmanov’s interest (should it exist) be confirmed.

To conclude I’m not saying that Usmanov will definitely not invest in Everton in the future, but I am saying there are clear obstacles to him doing so, and the evidence to date in terms of how Moshiri sold his R&W shares to Usmanov to acquire a stake in Everton, plus Usmanov’s comments re Arsenal suggest he has no intention of doing so.

*This is an opinion piece, views expressed are entirely my own

The post Usmanov to Everton – da ili nyet? appeared first on GrandOldTeam.

Read Full Article

Continue reading...
 
Everton interested in Joe Hart on loan via Royal Blue Mersey

589078766.0.jpg

The Toffees could nab the out-of-favor goalkeeper from Manchester City.

As shareholder Farhad Moshiri hinted at a few days ago, Everton are not done adding to the club. They have turned their attention to Manchester City goalkeeper, and England number one, Joe Hart on a season-long loan deal, according to BBC’s David Ornstein.


Everton & Sevilla have expressed interest in signing Joe Hart. He wants loan, doesn't feel 2wks enough to decide permanent future #MCFC #EFC

— David Ornstein (@bbcsport_david) August 17, 2016

Hart is out of favor at City after a poor display at this summer’s Euro’s. New manager Pep Guardiola started 34-year-old Willy Caballero in both the Premier League opener against Sunderland on Saturday and against Steaua Bucharest in the Champions League on Tuesday. Both times, Hart was named on the bench.

Following his performance to open the season, it may be harsh to drop Maarten Stekelenburg to the bench, but Hart has been a solid Premier League and international goalkeeper for years now and would not make the move to Everton unless he was assured first-choice minutes.

It is sounding like the Toffees will have to battle La Liga side Sevilla for the keeper, but Everton would seem to have the advantage on paper. Although Sevilla can offer Champions League football, signing with Everton would allow Hart to stay in England close to his home and battle for his spot in the national team. Plus, the Blues can better handle his reported £110,000/week wages, which would make Hart the highest-paid player on the team.

If it is just a loan move, it seems like a low-risk, high-reward type of decision for Everton. As long as the team is comfortable with the salary everything else is relatively easy to make sense of. Should Hart falter, they have two reliable keepers in Stekelenburg and Joel Robles.

On the other hand, Hart is a big personality to insert into your dressing room. And with that type of weekly wage, he could easily become a target for the ire of teammates, supporters and the media should he struggle.

Overall, however, on a week-to-week basis, Hart makes Everton a better team, adds depth and allows the board to shift their focus back to needs at right back, striker and elsewhere.

What are your thoughts on the rumored move? Let us know in the comments or on Twitter and Facebook. Thanks for reading!


Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 

Everton get Swarbrick for next game via Royal Blue Mersey

141813645.0.jpg

Officials announced for Everton game

Four Four Two did some number-crunching and came up with a list for every Premier League team of the average points-per-game cost or benefit that every referee has had for them in the middle of last season.

The match official who that study said Everton fans should love was referee Neil Swarbrick, who resulted in +0.426 points over six games officiated in the Premier League. In fact, over all competitions, the Blues are unbeaten in regulation time in nine games that Swarbrick has officiated, with the only loss coming in a penalty shootout two seasons ago in the FA Cup.

–—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—

Match Officials details –


Referee: Neil Swarbrick

Assistants:D Cann, D Eaton

Fourth official: S Duncan

Neil Swarbrick’s Everton record –

Swarbrick%20Everton.JPG
World Football

Neil Swarbrick Everton record

Referee data courtesy of World Football


Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 

Ross Barkley and Robbie Fowler lead tributes to Sid Benson after Everton scout’s passing at age of 74 via Daily Mail

Ross Barkley and Robbie Fowler have lead the tributes to Everton scout Sid Benson who died on Wednesday aged 74. Benson was a renowned talent spotter and popular character in Merseyside.
Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 
Everton attack looks to unlock West Brom via Royal Blue Mersey

524188158.0.jpg

The Toffees head to the Hawthorns to take on Tony Pulis’s defensive-minded side

Following a respectable opening day draw against Tottenham, Everton hit the road for their first away match of the season, taking on West Bromwich Albion at the Hawthorns on Saturday.

West Brom overview


At this point, we should all know what Tony Pulis is about:

Screen%20Shot%202016-08-17%20at%209.55.10%20PM.png


The consistency is sort of insane. If nothing else, Pulis has proven that he is a man who can do a job, where that job is getting your team about 45 points and a lower-mid-table finish.

For the most part he does it the same way every year, by eschewing all semblance of attacking in favor of dogged defending. The idea is to keep the scoring low, nick a goal off a set piece, and steal enough points over the course of the season to not get relegated. So far, so good.

Over the last 8 seasons of Premier League football, a Pulis-managed team has never been outside the bottom 4 in total shots, and only once in shots on target. Last year was no different; West Brom finished 19th in shots, 20th in shots on target, and 19th in goals. It doesn’t appear the shots they did take were any good either—according to Paul Riley’s numbers, Albion were 18th in expected goals for.

So how did they finish 14th? Mostly, it seems, by piling men into the box and forcing opponents into bad shots. The Baggies were 7th in the league in expected goals against despite giving up the 5th highest amount of shots. As such, they had the league’s lowest expected goals per shot allowed.

Likewise the passing numbers depict a team with very little control of the ball: league bottom in both pass ratio and pass accuracy.

Putting it all together, we’re looking at an attack that is borderline aggressive in its refusal to hold onto the ball or to do anything with it when they have it, and a defence that doesn’t mind giving up a ton of shots but tries at least to make sure they’re bad ones. The good news? Tops in the league in set piece conversion, which brings us to the current season.

West Brom travelled to Selhurst Park for their first match of the season, held the ball for about 38% of the game against Crystal Palace, completed passes at an abysmal 58% rate, but generated 8 shots from set pieces. Lo and behold, one of them went in, and the Baggies ran out 1-0 winners. Pulis gonna Pulis. I’m not sure what else we could have expected; after all, the team made all of one signing in the summer. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, I guess.

Tactics


Many of the stylistic points have been covered above, but as a quick overview, West Brom generally tend to utilize a direct buildup, specifically via long balls. Often these long balls are aimed in the channels at a speedy runner like Saido Berahino. Such was the case with Albion’s first chance against Crystal Palace on Saturday:

Shortly thereafter, West Brom generated another chance, this one from Darren Fletcher directly into the box:

Essentially the idea is to win the ball in an advanced area, allow a few other attackers to come into play, and try to generate a chance quickly. It’s not exactly rocket science but it can be effective, especially with runners like Berahino and stronger players like Salomón Rondon lurking about.

Without the ball, Albion will drop off, often into 2 banks of four, and defend in numbers. This is especially frustrating late in the game when chasing the lead, as Crystal Palace found out:

WBA%20v%20Bolasie.png


Ironically it was soon-to-be Everton’s newest signing Yannick Bolasie tasked with unlocking the West Brom rearguard. On this occasion the numbers were too many and he was dispossessed. Bolasie will likely see more of this should he line up on Saturday.

Matching up with Everton


This fixture last year was a memorable 3-2 victory for Everton in which West Brom were up 2-0 after 54 minutes. In many ways it was just a helter skelter match that fit with Everton’s helter skelter season, but it did at least show some organizational weaknesses in West Brom’s defense.

On the other hand, the return game was pure Pulis: a 1-0 away victory wherein Albion conceded a monstrous 33 shots and had 24% possession but managed to score with their only shot on goal.

One would expect more of the same this Saturday, and it would be a surprise if Everton didn’t have the lion’s share of possession. That being said, the Toffees might do well to try to coax Albion out of their own end—an odd aspect of West Brom’s play last year was that despite their defensive mindset they were quite prone to counter attacks. According to Michael Caley’s advanced stats, they gave up a ton of shots on the counter.

This seems mostly to stem from a lack of positional awareness and proper structure from Pulis’s men. Crystal Palace’s best chance on Saturday came from a needless West Brom giveaway in midfield:

Albion have the ball, but the midfielders are too bunched together, and neither defender is in a good position to receive the pass. Consequently the player on the ball can’t find a pass soon enough to avoid being pickpocketed.

It was a similar story in the preseason against PSG:

Once again there appears to be no danger, but a lack of passing options and an aggressive press results in a turnover. In the case the chance was finished.

Everton have every reason to believe they possess the skill and guile to break down an ultra-defensive setup. Should that approach fail to produce results, however, a possible second option is to try to force West Brom to make mistakes with the ball and catch them out of position. Fletcher aside, the Baggies do not possess tremendous passing or technical ability and their positional organization is not always on point.

Finally, Everton will need to keep their guard up more than ever when defending set pieces. The corollary is they need to be wary of conceding cheap fouls in their own end. The Albion blueprint isn’t particularly complex or secret, but it’s hurt Everton in the past.

Conclusion


It will be interesting to see how Koeman approaches this game given the options at his disposal. He was quite flexible against Tottenham, but this will be a test of a different kind. Should Everton fail to score early, they could find it difficult to find the net as the game wears on, and a plan B may be needed. The Toffees should in theory win this game, but they shouldn’t expect it to be easy.


Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 
Ross Barkley and Robbie Fowler lead tributes to Sid Benson after Everton scout passes away via Daily Mail

Ross Barkley and Robbie Fowler have lead the tributes to Everton scout Sid Benson who died on Wednesday aged 74. Benson was a renowned talent spotter and popular character in Merseyside.
Read Full Article


Continue reading...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top