catcherintherye
Player Valuation: £80m
Well yeah, that's exactly what i'm talking about. That's why I said 'ideal world' rather than 'world where things are slightly different but not that much'. The point was that we could theoretically improve on every single player we have, but realistically we're not going to.
I think you're a lot closer on this than most realise.
I actually think the "playing fifa"/football manager stuff is actually more a criticism at those of us who have played both, and think you can apply the same logic that you would use on a computer game to managing a team in reality. In those games you get a budget, you get players skills all nicely lined up with numbers attached, and can see which area you need most. It can be treated as an academic exercise and you can prioritise which world class player you want next in the best position.
Life is very different to this. A first team manager just wants better players. It's rare now that most look beyond that. If an improvement is available, in any position, they are going to want to sign them.
I've watched a couple of football documentaries now, Sunderland and Spurs in particular and whats really clear to me, is it's still not run too differently from my local club runs itself. If a better player is available, you go and get him. It's probably a criticism of football, but thats the reality of it.
I do get that people also want a longer term view, but they also tend to be the people who moan the most of the results aren't right in the short term.
I can tell you now, a manager would rather have 3 players who improve the team in random positions, than 5 Iwobi's who provide cover for the positions that we wanted, but ultimately don't make the team better.