mightymoyes
Player Valuation: £70m
Well we don't want those sort of players then.
what type of player likes being kept on against their will?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well we don't want those sort of players then.
Its not been great, granted.
But we did not sell Stones to fund transfer fees. FWIW, I think the next week or 2 could produce some rabbits out of the hat.
If and I stress if, Lukaku is sold the we would have to be very busy in the January window.
I stress I do not believe he will be sold, he will sign a new contract.
Right which further proves my point that we can't make players sign. Terms were agreed and a fee was agreed. He said thanks, but no thanks. I'm fine where I'm at.
If and I stress if, Lukaku is sold the we would have to be very busy in the January window.
I stress I do not believe he will be sold, he will sign a new contract.
If and I stress if, Lukaku is sold the we would have to be very busy in the January window.
I stress I do not believe he will be sold, he will sign a new contract.
I understand... well they can sign me on and keep me in reserves and pay me if they like.In simple terms, stones sale allows us to increase wages from the stcc profit made by roughly 800k ow, if we don't use that or close to it then come next season should we once again go in with the ambition of raising our wages by a huge amount which given it as apparently the boards strategy to do so from the outset would make that scenario a likelihood, it would neccesitate the sale of a player who would net us a huge stcc trading profit next summer, currently only lukaku and Barkley could give us that.
See the concern now?
Mate....... the money these players are on.......they should be playing out of their skin for whichever team they play for.what type of player likes being kept on against their will?
Right which further proves my point that we can't make players sign. Terms were agreed and a fee was agreed. He said thanks, but no thanks. I'm fine where I'm at.
If and I stress if, Lukaku is sold the we would have to be very busy in the January window.
I stress I do not believe he will be sold, he will sign a new contract.
Oh Esk...why do you fuel the bedwetters?
In a notoiously difficult period to obtain any decent signings mate, and with no Lukaku - a very real possibility of a very poor first half of the season - combined with the difficulty it has been shown we have to get even second tier targets (witsel etc) over the line mate, not a chance on earth, we'd hardly be able to raise it to the level allowed already by a Stones sale mate even if we did a Newcastle like throwing money around from last summer on overpriced dross.
Lukaku left the same window as Stones did, then Moshiri will have 100% made a rod for his own back and played right into the hands of people who said he would asset strip us and be in for the quick buck (which i don't believe he is - but that will be the narritive and once stuck with it good luck shaking that off)
What's happened? Bolasie and Kone? You honestly think we couldn't afford those players without selling Stones with the increase in tv money this year? We'd spent 7 million to that point. The saving in wages of Osman and Hibbert saw to that alone there or there abouts. We still haven't signed the players that we all want to see coming in, that's because they're just harder to secure.I'm confused. If the reason was that they all strung us along then why did everything happen once Stones was sold?