Same here...would definitely be a lot cheaper. Bournemouth wants 50 millions for Brooks...no chance.Rather have Benrahma.
Same here...would definitely be a lot cheaper. Bournemouth wants 50 millions for Brooks...no chance.Rather have Benrahma.
Its like asking why we gave Richarlison and DCL extended deals.
Not now no but you don't think he's getting replaced in the summer? I think we'll spend some decent change on a new one.But we arent selling him mate.
As much as everyone on here wants us to.
Not now no but you don't think he's getting replaced in the summer? I think we'll spend some decent change on a new one.
Not now no but you don't think he's getting replaced in the summer? I think we'll spend some decent change on a new one.
I dont.
And even if we do, somebody will buy him.
But what does it matter mate, he would still have 12months left on his contract next summer without the extension.He’s right, we aren’t selling him. We will buy a better keeper than him but no one will buy him.
Same but forget paying 150k a week, Fulham are absolute clowns if that's true.I wouldn't have minded Loftus-Cheek as competition for Gomes, but I suppose it's time to accept that Sigurdsson is going to be used for that role.
I wouldn't have minded Loftus-Cheek as competition for Gomes, but I suppose it's time to accept that Sigurdsson is going to be used for that role.
But what does it matter mate, he would still have 12months left on his contract next summer without the extension.
Then give him the extension with 3 or 2 years remaining when he’s actually earned it, or in this case hasn’t. We gave him a contract extension one year after signing him, what’s the point in that? Why didn’t we just give him a 6 year contract initially?
Its sickening. I remember my reaction when we gave him the extension among all the WNGLAND NR 1!! posts. Sadly it was valid, wouldve been much better for the team if it was wrong.We gave him a 6 year deal, 2 years ago...