Hey Walter, your post indicates the topic of conversation with your doctor was about inward protection from inhalation. You may, due to not clarifying your point, have discussed the issue of preventing spread by individuals exhaling. So I think the bucket monster's response is fair.
It is indeed contested terrain in terms of the evidence base, but on balance it is a low cost low hassle intervention that COULD prevent spread.
So yes, fair to raise doubts, but my personal view is it isn't a big problem or imposition, so can't see why folk get upset.
I mean, if we'd been
The problem is that your opinion basically boils down to saying that you think eminent researchers are lying / making stuff up / plain wrong.
Fine, but I've worked with many a leading academic and frankly they're not much given to making up rubbish or taking part in weird conspiracies. Well, maybe the odd one, but most are extremely serious, focused and hardworking people. Who try their best to produce robust research and explain the limitations of their work, where appropriate.
Yet the nutters on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc seem to suddenly have some form of equal status, because they have an opinion.
And that's why we are doomed.