Farhad Moshiri

[Frang]

The vote is very like the Brexit referendum, I think we should have a second fresh poll!

would be landslide disappointment, just like it would be leave !

 

[BlueStevie35]

standing still and not actually signing a striker is madness in our current position. with our run in we will need to pick up points, and that means scoring goals.

And Brands knows that, hence why he's trying to sort matters by shifting players off the wage bill. If it was up to the 'experts' we'd have over 100 players on the books just to say we are spending money

 

[Frang]

And Brands knows that, hence why he's trying to sort matters by shifting players off the wage bill. If it was up to the 'experts' we'd have over 100 players on the books just to say we are spending money

no mate, we would have 25 very good quality platers on the books, all on the correct pay and contracts.

I can only dream. but with Moshiri incharge its anyones guess as to what and who he wants next.

 

[PhilRegan]

https://www.theblueroomefc.com/2017/05/esk-ffp-mean-evertons-transfer-strategy/

That is from the end of 2016/7 season but gives a basic outline

That's a nice article but a lot of it was based on speculation, and like you said was a few years outdated but a basic overview. It doesn't really help in explaining how we are directly effected by FFP now though.

 

[BlueStevie35]

no mate, we would have 25 very good quality platers on the books, all on the correct pay and contracts.

I can only dream. but with Moshiri incharge its anyones guess as to what and who he wants next.

So by your deductions we'd have 7 players getting big money for not playing much

 

[BlueStevie35]

That's a nice article but a lot of it was based on speculation, and like you said was a few years outdated but a basic overview. It doesn't really help in explaining how we are directly effected by FFP now though.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Financial_Fair_Play_Regulations

That explains how FFP works

 

[PhilRegan]

That's a nice article but a lot of it was based on speculation, and like you said was a few years outdated but a basic overview. It doesn't really help in explaining how we are directly effected by FFP now though.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spo...n-wages-transfers-income-expenditure-15351870

This article sheds a slightly different angle to our wage bill if correct. Surely if we are 11th and below the likes of Palace we can't be effected that much due to FFP. Again though I have no idea what rules may of may not be hindering us.

 

[roydo]

That's a nice article but a lot of it was based on speculation, and like you said was a few years outdated but a basic overview. It doesn't really help in explaining how we are directly effected by FFP now though.

I think the current issue is probably more to do with wages restrictions; basically, a club cannot increase its wage bill by a certain percentage, based on turnover or something.

Its why Arsenal cant sign anyone this window neither. Their restriction is a Ozil shaped one.

 

[PhilRegan]

I think the current issue is probably more to do with wages restrictions; basically, a club cannot increase its wage bill by a certain percentage, based on turnover or something.

Its why Arsenal cant sign anyone this window neither. Their restriction is a Ozil shaped one.

Wouldn't have this limited our previous windows though as our revenue can't have increased that much ?

 

[roydo]

Wouldn't have this limited our previous windows though as our revenue can't have increased that much ?

Must have been ok I guess. I am no expert btw, just get stuff from on here and Talksport.

 

[PhilRegan]

Must have been ok I guess. I am no expert btw, just get stuff from on here and Talksport.

Yes same here, just trying to make sense of it all and find the facts myself. It's all a bit confusing and unsure.

 

[dublinbluenose]

Wouldn't have this limited our previous windows though as our revenue can't have increased that much ?

We didn't sell a Lukaku or a Stones in the last 12 months

 

[roydo]

We didn't sell a Lukaku or a Stones in the last 12 months

Good point that. We havnt announced a significant sponsor deal neither have we?

 

[PhilRegan]

We didn't sell a Lukaku or a Stones in the last 12 months

Yep suppose that could of helped the books. The accounts looked promising last time out though and doesn't Moshiri hold the debt now too ?

 

[dublinbluenose]

Good point that. We havnt announced a significant sponsor deal neither have we?

That'd be spread over the lifetime of the deal wouldn't though?