hallamblue
Player Valuation: £40m
West Ham paid Sheffield United about £25 million for relegating them by using ineligible players quite a while ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
West Ham paid Sheffield United about £25 million for relegating them by using ineligible players quite a while ago.
The club had to work with the pl to sign players they had to agree what we could spend ect. Also since then club has been cutting back ven what we have spent in 2023 beto is not from this window is next year so we have still spent very little this season. Club is not in a great way with the accounts but that is because of the stadium. They have cut costs of the playing side mina walcott and more
Totally agree.I know that’s what has been claimed, but I find it hard to believe.
I believe EFC consulted with the PL about the application of Covid exceptions that had never been used before, and hadn’t been 100% clarified.
But I really cannot see the PL making financial calculations on behalf of a club so that they can then provide instructions on what they can and cannot spend in between the submission of accounts. It’s not the PL’s job to do that.
I’d expect the PL to simply refer to the rules that all 20 PL clubs have agreed to, and then tell them to make their own calculations that adhere to the agreed rules.
I think it’s totally inappropriate for the PL to do Everton’s job for them, to the point that I don’t think that is what happened.
Think the club got very lucky with covid and has bent the rules like what chelsea have done with the long contracts 7/8 yr deals for players. Also it has already been said that the club has broke only one rule and that is what we have to face. The league has decided at this time we dont have to answer for what happend over covid, somebody will be able to say more than me about ut.I know that’s what has been claimed, but I find it hard to believe.
I believe EFC consulted with the PL about the application of Covid exceptions that had never been used before, and hadn’t been 100% clarified.
But I really cannot see the PL making financial calculations on behalf of a club so that they can then provide instructions on what they can and cannot spend in between the submission of accounts. It’s not the PL’s job to do that.
I’d expect the PL to simply refer to the rules that all 20 PL clubs have agreed to, and then tell them to make their own calculations that adhere to the agreed rules.
I think it’s totally inappropriate for the PL to do Everton’s job for them, to the point that I don’t think that is what happened.
The Premier League did however state that Everton were not in breach of regulations at the end of season 2021/2022 when the furore with Leeds, Burnley kicked off.Totally agree.
Its silly to assume that the Premier League "signed off" on accounts that clearly hadnt been fully audited.
The FA fined them. Not the league.
Few things with the whole "they'll sue" situation...
They can't sue the club as the league signed off on all our financials.
The hearing is about the 2021/22 accounts, not years prior to that.
The rumour is it's about adjusted earnings before tax.
The league and the club had regular dialogue.
According to the rules, clubs are automatically sent to a independent commission if the rolling 3 year losses are above the threshold. Which are were and the only club in the league to do so.
The hearing won't be about how the club gained an advantage over other clubs via financial rule breaking.
City on the other hand....
When I read that statement earlier in the day it got me thinking how that could be of a charge was now on the table.The Premier League did however state that Everton were not in breach of regulations at the end of season 2021/2022 when the furore with Leeds, Burnley kicked off.
Did they?The Premier League did however state that Everton were not in breach of regulations at the end of season 2021/2022 when the furore with Leeds, Burnley kicked off.
Did they?
Ive looked and I cant find a Statement from the Premier League stating that.
Im not being a penis, I honestly cant find it.
We will be fine as long as we have hired a competent barrister to represent us
1) That’s mainly speculation although the PL did say that Everton were compliantThe FA fined them. Not the league.
Few things with the whole "they'll sue" situation...
They can't sue the club as the league signed off on all our financials.
The hearing is about the 2021/22 accounts, not years prior to that.
The rumour is it's about adjusted earnings before tax.
The league and the club had regular dialogue.
According to the rules, clubs are automatically sent to a independent commission if the rolling 3 year losses are above the threshold. Which are were and the only club in the league to do so.
The hearing won't be about how the club gained an advantage over other clubs via financial rule breaking.
City on the other hand....
Therein lies the problem. They probably assigned Sharpy to it after he was declared persona non grata by the fans.We will be fine as long as we have hired a competent barrister to represent us