Osamabindiesel
Player Valuation: £70m
I wouldn’t be concerned until City is held accountable. That is the only way I see us losing any kind of appeal or being charged with something egregious
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you have Man City with 115 cases, putting out a story that Everton have only 1 case yet the league want them to have the worst case scenario.I have no idea why a 12 point deduction story helps us.
When is this hearing?
I never said it was a court - it is a quasi-judicial or 'other proceeding'. Schedule 1.1 defines what criminal and appellate proceedings are, but the Schedule clearly includes "Other Proceedings".
Schedule 1.12
Other proceedings at first instance
12 Proceedings other than criminal proceedings and appellate proceedings are active from the time when arrangements for the hearing are made or, if no such arrangements are previously made, from the time the hearing begins, until the proceedings are disposed of or discontinued or withdrawn; and for the purposes of this paragraph any motion or application made in or for the purposes of any proceedings, and any pre-trial review in the county court, is to be treated as a distinct proceeding.
Even if it is argued that this Act does not apply to the Commission's deliberations, it is still bound by the Rule of Natural Justice and all parties are bound to respect the sub judice rule, particularly participating parties, and anyone who has the ability to publish material that might be seen to prejudice nthe proceedings.
Could be. I can see why the Premier League want to look tough although it does make them look incompetent whatever happens.When you have Man City with 115 cases, putting out a story that Everton have only 1 case yet the league want them to have the worst case scenario.
All clubs/media will argue Everton's case for them because in comparison, 1 v 115 isn't that bad.
I doubt The Premier League will want to be weak in the media especially when they have the Government looking in trying to control aspects of their company.
I think the leak is hand in hand with the club and Premier League to sway the commission so they see the negative reaction to point deduction and also shows the Prem as acting strong
2 things stand out:
1: Weve apparently been working with the premier league so they were fully aware.
2: Man City would be doomed
A punishment makes no sense at all.
Again!Imagine we were just a normal, functioning football club again
what's the fun in that??Imagine we were just a normal, functioning football club again
Im sick of hearing and talking about Owners/chairmen/Take overs/DoF/agents/FFP/P&S/VAR/PL/Referees/Transfer fees etc......
We speak more about men in suits than we do about the players who we turn up or tune in to watch every week.
Football is dead and i wish it was so easy to walk away from it.
I will happily go with your first three words.Lets leave it.
It doesn't apply to these circumstances. We can go round in circles but it applies to criminal proceedings and civil proceedings.
Premier league clubs have agreed contractually how to sort out problems. It is not a judicial process. There is no Judge.
Even if you want to say its civil proceedings (and it is not) a civil contempt would be enforceable by one of the parties going to a Judge who has authority to commit to prison for contempt.
There are many tribunals heard across the country to determine varied issues. For example a Committee by Governors to consider expulsions, dismissal or local FA's decisions about red cards etc.
You can't be in contempt for those just like you cannot be in contempt for this. There would be bedlam across the country.