Llyrap
Player Valuation: £5m
These are legal proceedings or quasi-legal proceedings. It does not need to be a court. Once it is a proceeding that has powers to impose punishment on a defendant or respondent, the rules of Natural Justice apply, including the absolute prohibition against publishing anything that could impede or prejudice proceedings BEFORE a final verdict has been reached.
As I already posted:
Contempt of Court Act 1981
Strict liability
1The strict liability rule.
In this Act “the strict liability rule” means the rule of law whereby conduct may be treated as a contempt of court as tending to interfere with the course of justice in particular legal proceedings regardless of intent to do so.
2Limitation of scope of strict liability.
(1)The strict liability rule applies only in relation to publications, and for this purpose “publication” includes any speech, writing, [F1programme included in a cable programme service] or other communication in whatever form, which is addressed to the public at large or any section of the public.
(2)The strict liability rule applies only to a publication which creates a substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.
(3)The strict liability rule applies to a publication only if the proceedings in question are active within the meaning of this section at the time of the publication.
It is not a Court. The vast majority of the act relates to Criminal proceedings - have a look at schedule 1.
Everton are subject to an independent commission created by contractual agreement between football teams. Nothing to do with this act.
Any leaks does not mean that Natural Justice has been breached. If the breach comes directly from the commission and they have made a decision before hearing from both parties, that may make the process unfair. No evidence of this.