Simply unacceptable that. They should be embarrassed (though we know they wouldn't be a they chuck that kind of performance in nearly every other game)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Willing to go out on a limb and say there's a less-than-likely percent chance we'll be signing a striker who went for about £100m a year so back and must be on best part of £400k a week. Even IF we sweetend the pot with Rondon in part-ex.Dont be ridiculous. Lukaku would 100% change this team if he signed in January.
I'll take 'things said about FB92 every day' for 500 please, Alex+1
We dont want his kind here
That's tosh mate, I recall the defeats to Leicester and Stoke at Goodison were because they sat back, waited for us to lose possession pushed up high on them and then break at pace, turning our stretched defence.There was no change in the system form 1st to 2nd season. What happened was that opponents pressed us much more and the players we had at the back (apart from Stones) couldn't handle it.
He needed cash to upgrade the defence and the GK. His biggest fault in that 2nd season was buying Funes Mori and not VVD.
That was happening too, and it came down to a lack of appropriate personnel to deal with it.That's tosh mate, I recall the defeats to Leicester and Stoke at Goodison were because they sat back, waited for us to lose possession pushed up high on them and the break at pace, turning our stretched defence.
Teams were doing it to us season 1 as well, but we properly ride our luck at times. Villa away was one lucky win. Think we somehow got a 0-0 at Palace when they should have battered us.
That's tosh mate, I recall the defeats to Leicester and Stoke at Goodison were because they sat back, waited for us to lose possession pushed up high on them and the break at pace, turning our stretched defence.
Teams were doing it to us season 1 as well, but we properly ride our luck at times. Villa away was one lucky win. Think we somehow got a 0-0 at Palace when they should have battered us.
Onana definitely needs to play deeper. Let Gana do the harrying just in front of him with Iwobi in the 10 as you say.Onana and Iwobi clueless, Gana trying to do everything on his own when they play through them.
I think Onana would be much more effective playing deeper with Gana, leave Iwobi behind Maupay in the 10
Categories like 'deep completions' and 'progressive passes'. Pffft!I think these stats prove that just getting a striker in isn't going to be the miracle cure some people suggest. It'd help of course, but if we can't actually get them the ball then it's not going to be transformative.
Disclaimer: Rafael WAS THE WRONG PERSON TO HIRE. But here is his chart as a comparison .View attachment 191053
In black and white. 'Back him' is just suicidal for us.
Lack of fire power Dave, for sure, but, lack of creativity as well and that is the real problem. When we play against the teams we expect to beat, they will keep it tight and hit is on the break. We have no idea whatsoever how to unlock a team that sits off us and challenges us to find a way to break them down.Categories like 'deep completions' and 'progressive passes'. Pffft!
Utter nerd-speak.
It's not crude to just refine it all down to not having a strike force, it's just common sense. If you have a couple of strikers worth more than a balloon to a team then everything becomes better behind it: midfielders' passes reach their targets, and getting on the scoresheet gives something to hang onto and tackles on the opposition and tracking the of opponents all increase massively.
We've all known and said the issue is lack of firepower. We knew it before the manager and the media started talking it up. Let's not make this over-complicated.
The two charts reflect the vastly different strengths of the teams then and now: last season the problem was defence; this season it's having no attackers.Disclaimer: Rafael WAS THE WRONG PERSON TO HIRE. But here is his chart as a comparison .
View attachment 191086