10 goals is a lot in a team that comes 16th. Why did we try to replace him with someone who got 0 and as a result got relegated.
I'm deliberately trying to be contrarian with the majority view on this. I just don't agree with the consensus and the more I see us play the more confused I get. I've been saying we need goals brought in since before Richarlison went, so I'm starting to pull my hair out at our strategy this summer.
Sorry but did you just suggest signing McNeil, for our right wing, was to replace Richarlison???