tbf Chris - I know it's a different post you replied to - but we aren't needing Maupay to be a 20-goal a season striker. no club outside of the top six has one of them, so we need to get out of this idea we need one of those. We just need players to score goals and part of that is working on ways to get to goal and on a consistent basis. If that is too hard from open play, then improve set-pieces, find little margins.
Maupay can score goals, but he's not the type of striker we needed. I think we ran before we could walk in that regard; we needed a player to be Dom's folly, not a complete alternative to change the way we play.
on your actual reply to me
- Surely both are true? We can't let him fully off the hook mate. Yes, we need better players, I'm with you there, and better players tend to pick things up quicker. That being said, if you look at Lampard's other teams, he was always a good manager when it came to build up, setting up a team and finding a way to pass through the first third. But from then he always has seemed to rely on individuality and ultimately unless you have the very best players it'll only get you so far. So IMO that is something he can improve on - him and his coaching staff.
But yes, overall the team has pretty much zero quality in the attack, as a unit that is. We have a striker who relies on others to create chances for him - which is fine, because he's good at finishing them when they're in the box for him - but a) he can't stay fit and b) we have one player who can create chances on a consistent basis and they aren't the kind of chances Dom thrives off...
We're reaping what we've sewn not just with the reckless spending, but then letting certain managers and certain board members rip the team of any quality either because they didn't like the players or because we needed a quick buck.