2022/23 Frank Lampard

[GrandOldSte117]

He looked genuinely shocked that the fans were engaging with him in a positive manner, I think we’ve broke him

Id say its because its the first time he's actually touched someone outside of his tax bracket

 

[The binman chronicles]

Against Arsenal??

Followed up by away to the RS. The new man will be broke before he's had to choose March's pre match meals.

 

[ProZ]

I am a real and credible threat for the Arsenal game if Lampard is still in the dugout

 

[BlueStevie35]

Id say its because its the first time he's actually touched someone outside of his tax bracket

Oh here we go, the lazy Tory shout

 

[banno]

Sacking Lampard won't help. No meaningful players are coming in. We are going to have to dig ourselves out of it largely with what we have and the two choices we have are either Frank stopping the negative 5 at the back and approaching games like he did in the second half, or we go again for another manager, who will ultimately realise we don't have the players, try and stop up the goals (understandably) and end up back where Frank is today. I'm afraid - Frank is the answer imho

So you are of the conclusion that Lampards tactics are the problem. So we need a manager to change our current tactics. What have we to lose as Lampard hasn't the nous to sort these player or tactics out.

 

[Norwegian Cow]

Get him out now! Should have jibbed him many games ago. We will go down if we keep him.

 

[Drico]

Needs more time.

 

[GrandOldSte117]

Oh here we go, the lazy Tory shout

They are the true oppressed.

 

[blueuk808]

LOL put down that crack pipe.

both - nice and reasoned... maybe put down your warm carling and have a think about it - revolving managers with everyone elses players. Negative tactics to try and nick 1-0 wins - if he changes approach we get out of it. If it stays as is we go down. If we go for yet another manager - and the options are pretty dire - it's 50:50 at best. Personally I'd go for the positive tactics and see where we end up.

 

[BlueStevie35]

They are the true oppressed.

Is there any actual proof that he even votes that way?

 

[dan7787]

Sacking Lampard won't help. No meaningful players are coming in. We are going to have to dig ourselves out of it largely with what we have and the two choices we have are either Frank stopping the negative 5 at the back and approaching games like he did in the second half, or we go again for another manager, who will ultimately realise we don't have the players, try and stop up the goals (understandably) and end up back where Frank is today. I'm afraid - Frank is the answer imho

I agree, let’s see how we do with a better winger Danjuma, and letttinh Frank play something other than 5 at the back without attacking him

 

[EuroTexan]

Followed up by away to the RS. The new man will be broke before he's had to choose March's pre match meals.

Yup I'd say they're saving the new man for the fixtures starting with Leeds that he'd have some hope of winning. Don't want to waste the hopeful new manager bounce before then

Also, there's the chance in his current haze he'll resign rather than wait for the payoff from firing

 

[Runub]

Fancy letting him get the bus back north when he is stone throw from home, inhumane

 

[GrandOldSte117]

Is there any actual proof that he even votes that way?

Frank Lampard: a Tory

Frank Lampard has declared that he is Tory and that he would love David Cameron to win the next election. Why does this disappoint me so much?

www.google.com

 

[BlueStevie35]

both - nice and reasoned... maybe put down your warm carling and have a think about it - revolving managers with everyone elses players. Negative tactics to try and nick 1-0 wins - if he changes approach we get out of it. If it stays as is we go down. If we go for yet another manager - and the options are pretty dire - it's 50:50 at best. Personally I'd go for the positive tactics and see where we end up.

It’s done, no amount of tactic changing will do it, we have to bring someone new in or we’ll be down by March