You’ve realise McNeil is crap?lol
I think we should go with the below...as its balancsd. However we lack the 3 attacking starters.
Pickford
Patterson Coady Tarkowski Mykolenko
Garner Onana
Iwobi
??? ??? ???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’ve realise McNeil is crap?lol
I think we should go with the below...as its balancsd. However we lack the 3 attacking starters.
Pickford
Patterson Coady Tarkowski Mykolenko
Garner Onana
Iwobi
??? ??? ???
I think you're getting hung up about the use of the word 'thrown'. In context, I was replying to someone who was saying 'well now he knows who he can trust' by saying he already knew that. He picked players he knows he can't trust, and doesn't trust (hence him not picking them in the first place). He wanted to make loads of changes to rest players, and in order to do that he had to pick the players he did. It's fine, as i've already said, if we win on saturday i'll agree with his decision. I just don't think he really expected any different though. His comments after the game weren't him saying 'I'm really surprised because these are really good players who are an important part of my squad and I just don't understand what happened there', it was him saying 'some of these jokers have had the cheek to tell me they think they should be playing, well that's why they aren't'.
Edit - I've just noticed you've argued above that he was sending a message to the board by picking this team, which kind of goes directly against what you've been saying to me, so i'm a little confused.
Chelsea had the pulling power to bring in one of the best managers in the game to work with the likes of Mount, Kante, Havertz, Rudiger, Thiago Silva, James, Kovacic etc etc. What market are we shopping in to turn Keane, Dacs, Davies, Holgate, McNeil, Maupay etc into top-half quality Prem players? Every player FL dropped at Chelsea would walk into our team even now. None of our lads get on their bench. Therein lies the difference.He also threw Chelsea players under the bus when he was on a bad run, and then they went on the win the champions league without him
Of course but somebody of his calibre doesn't just rock up here , he would have had to have seen something more than money. He's in his 60s and won everything lol.Surely Ancelloti was only here because of Moshiri, no? It was Moshiri who was happy to pay him the £12m salary, agreed to hire his son, agreed to a Madrid exit clause, agreed to sign the likes of James and Allan for him etc. For all Moshiri's many, many failings I'm not sure what more he could have done to get and keep Carlo here tbf.
I watched very closely after the 52nd minute
lol
I think we should go with the below...as its balancsd. However we lack the 3 attacking starters.
Pickford
Patterson Coady Tarkowski Mykolenko
Garner Onana
Iwobi
??? ??? ???
????
I know he hasn't had enough time to play well. But what does he do? What is playing well going to be?Useful
I know he hasn't had enough time to play well. But what does he do? What is playing well going to be?
Anyway point here is Zat is a maniac if he thinks dropping Gana is going to solve the issue of the midfield giving teams too much space. That's a Lampard problem.
I thought you got me and Oil mixed up.I'm unsure what's confusing you.
Would amuse me watching Onana play as a 6.I know he hasn't had enough time to play well. But what does he do? What is playing well going to be?
Anyway point here is Zat is a maniac if he thinks dropping Gana is going to solve the issue of the midfield giving teams too much space. That's a Lampard problem.
Learn how to organize a press. Rapidly.And what does Lampard do to solve the issue
Tbf I didn't really pay close attention last night either, especially after Holgate fell on his face. But if Garner were doing things well I'd have noticed. I wasn't that tuned out.I thought you got me and Oil mixed up.
Would amuse me watching Onana play as a 6.