Are you comparing the civil rights movement with gay fan groups at football matches? Wow back atcha.
But seriously, the point I appear to be struggling to make is that by creating an identity gives the haters a target. If all ginger Everton fans formed a group and sat together in the pub and in the grounds, at some point they would get taunted. Now a group of gay football fans is not as visually identifiable but you can guarantee that some level of taunting or abuse would eventually take place if, for example, some knuckle-dragger gets wind that he's sat next to a gay fan group.
Protest groups and fights for rights are a whole world away from what I'm talking about.
I think the point is that gay players and, to some extent fans, feel the need to conceal it, and go to great lengths to do so. There is definitely a homophobic element to football that hasn't been addressed simply because nobody has come out. There are hundreds of thousands of footballers plying their trade over Europe and not a single gay man apart from that Swedish second division chap and Hitzlsperger? Nonsense. They have plenty to fear by coming out and it shouldn't be the case.
I do agree that gay people shouldn't be under any pressure to come out and it's none of anybody's business, but you can't help but feel that their silence is being imposed more through intimidation than motivated by a personal sense of privacy. We need a couple of gay lads to get out there, soak up the initial abuse until some homophobic flutes are identified, stadium bans dished out and a message sent that it won't be tolerated. A couple of years down the line, gay people playing football is completely normalized and nobody gives a crap anymore. That's where we want to be.
People coming out in football shouldn't be a big deal, but the fact that it evidently is means we need to confront the issue, not tell homosexuals that their methods of concealment aren't up to scratch.