bluemangroup
Player Valuation: £70m
They don't know what they've let themselves in for if they've got to feed you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Friend?
bluemangroup
Player Valuation: £70m
Sorry fam.
I thought they were just getting us on sale or return for a season...
Paul Rideout
Player Valuation: £40m
Where's the feeder club purchase money, Sandro?
AaronTheBlue
Player Valuation: £60m
asked my mate whose half spanish,
he says it just simply states 'deulofeu will be transferred to everton with the option to buy'
he says it just simply states 'deulofeu will be transferred to everton with the option to buy'
AaronTheBlue
Player Valuation: £60m
but he also said it could be mean he'll be trasnferred to everton with the option to buy of BARCELONA i.e we'll sign him but they have a buy back clause.
Boss_Blue
I will find you and consensually bum you
Coffee and TV
Player Valuation: £25m
Barca love a buy back clause. Not sure if we would accept one though.
Reminds me for some reason of the episode in "Only fools and horses" when Del start to speak German in Pidgin English with a quasi German accent.
Jozzy
Player Valuation: £10m
I really don't want a buy back clause, I'd honestly be willing to pay an extra 5m if it meant they couldn't sign him back.
It's better than not getting him at all yes but the way I see it is we get to borrow the player and we pay a bond, we look after the player, work hard on him then once he's good he leaves and we get or bond back and a couple extra mill back as a thank you. But if we don't develop him into a good player we're left with him and we don't get the bond back.
You'd be better off just to loan him rather than sign him with a buy-back clause. If we loaned him presumably we wouldn't have to pay a fee and would most likely just have to cover his wages which wouldnt be that bad. In the unlikely situation he doesn't perform at all and has behaviour issues he goes back to Barca and we've lost nothing.
If we were to sign him with the clause Barca would only have to pay a couple of million to get him back, which we'd just about lose on paying his signing fee, joining a new club and signing a new contact he'd also ask for more money so we'd be paying much higher wages too. We'd be risking our cash but for no real reward because as soon as he comes good he goes and essentially we'd make nothing.
It's better than not getting him at all yes but the way I see it is we get to borrow the player and we pay a bond, we look after the player, work hard on him then once he's good he leaves and we get or bond back and a couple extra mill back as a thank you. But if we don't develop him into a good player we're left with him and we don't get the bond back.
You'd be better off just to loan him rather than sign him with a buy-back clause. If we loaned him presumably we wouldn't have to pay a fee and would most likely just have to cover his wages which wouldnt be that bad. In the unlikely situation he doesn't perform at all and has behaviour issues he goes back to Barca and we've lost nothing.
If we were to sign him with the clause Barca would only have to pay a couple of million to get him back, which we'd just about lose on paying his signing fee, joining a new club and signing a new contact he'd also ask for more money so we'd be paying much higher wages too. We'd be risking our cash but for no real reward because as soon as he comes good he goes and essentially we'd make nothing.
Too soon to move him centrally for me. He's better
Barca and Madrid live for buy-back options. I don't think it'd be an issue, as it generally means that the original 'bond', as you put it, is lower anyway.
ITS ON TWITTER LAD IT MUST BE TRUE
- Status