He’s been massively worse than most, bar is little 5 game cameo. I’d rather have Charlie Adam
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
He’s been massively worse than most, bar is little 5 game cameo. I’d rather have Charlie Adam
Weird scapegoat though, hey lads
I’ve had a drink because I’m off work for the week but just thought I’d stop by to say I really dislike this man.
carolinablue232
Player Valuation: £70m
Keane might be straight line fast but he turns like an aircraft carrier.
CRIMHEAD
Player Valuation: £40m
No question. His anticipation is also bad. I really think he's a big part of the problem.
carolinablue232
Player Valuation: £70m
Another one we’re stuck with though.
Marius57
Player Valuation: £60m
The curious case of Sigurdsson - and how Brands holds key to future
Sigurdsson has come under criticism
Found this quite interesting really. Yes stats are only good to an extent but everyone on this forum would probably say they want Eriksson instead of siggy. But the stats reflect that it's crap strikers that cause the issue as siggy is still achieving the same expected assists etc as when at Swansea, so is doing exactly what we wanted when we bought him. And is actually doing better than eriksson in most aspects but Eriksson has good players around him.
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
The curious case of Sigurdsson - and how Brands holds key to future
Sigurdsson has come under criticismwww.liverpoolecho.co.uk
Found this quite interesting really. Yes stats are only good to an extent but everyone on this forum would probably say they want Eriksson instead of siggy. But the stats reflect that it's crap strikers that cause the issue as siggy is still achieving the same expected assists etc as when at Swansea, so is doing exactly what we wanted when we bought him.
you are dead right mate, our crap strikers MAKE siggy disappear into his own shadow every week ( bar the first few weeks when he was playing well )
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
Good player but not for the price and wages. Doesn't offer enough. Doesn't fit into the manager's preferred system. Too late to sell for any decent money, so may as well keep him.
sageyefc
Player Valuation: £90m
And when we bought him he simply wasn't good enough.The curious case of Sigurdsson - and how Brands holds key to future
Sigurdsson has come under criticism
Found this quite interesting really. Yes stats are only good to an extent but everyone on this forum would probably say they want Eriksson instead of siggy. But the stats reflect that it's crap strikers that cause the issue as siggy is still achieving the same expected assists etc as when at Swansea, so is doing exactly what we wanted when we bought him. And is actually doing better than eriksson in most aspects but Eriksson has good players around him.
Marius57
Player Valuation: £60m
He is doing the same as before we bought him. If tosun or dcl finished some chances he would have more assists. We shouldn't be expecting him to be doing more than he was capable of at Swansea. Especially when their striker actually scored a decent number of goals for them. Not his fault we spent twice as much as we should.
Not his fault though. He is doing the same as he did at Swansea. We overpaid, not him. And actually, Eriksson is considered one of the better players in the league, but on paper isn't actually doing all that more than siggy. If he came here, he would look just as crap as everyone makes out siggy is as the players around him still wouldn't be able to finish or time their runs properly
sageyefc
Player Valuation: £90m
Anyone with a set of eyes can see Ericsson is only a completely different level to gylfi
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
not getting into a debate about this, but are you comparing siggy to eriksen???
Blameeveryonebargylfi.com
He is not doing better than Eriksson, I would seriously consider having sectioned anyone who says soThe curious case of Sigurdsson - and how Brands holds key to future
Sigurdsson has come under criticism
Found this quite interesting really. Yes stats are only good to an extent but everyone on this forum would probably say they want Eriksson instead of siggy. But the stats reflect that it's crap strikers that cause the issue as siggy is still achieving the same expected assists etc as when at Swansea, so is doing exactly what we wanted when we bought him. And is actually doing better than eriksson in most aspects but Eriksson has good players around him.
- Status