Zezti
Player Valuation: £70m
Your agenda against Gylfi is quite weirdBut Iceland mate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your agenda against Gylfi is quite weirdBut Iceland mate
Stats from when Barkley was playing with one of the best strikers in the league and Gylfi was playing with DCL and Niasse
it's easy when you have a better supporting cast and a non-crap manager with a boring strategy/formation
mark my words, this upcoming season under silva will allow gylfi to shine
Your agenda against Gylfi is quite weird
just because one supports gylfi and thinks he can be better than ross doesn't automatically make ross a crap player. ross is, however:But Iceland mate
The data states Gylfi's an idiot?The data states otherwise
just because one supports gylfi and thinks he can be better than ross doesn't automatically make ross a crap player. ross is, however:
1.) less wise for choosing to transfer to a bigger club - therefore, his playtime and form have been severely reduced
2.) damaged goods
3.) sour attitude
ross was good. but you have to wonder how much of his stats were bumped due to better times, and where gylfi could be in those same situations.
Ok mate, Gylfi last year compared to Ross’ last full season with us when, as some as said he was absolutely garbage and called out constantly by Koeman. Info is based on 90 min averages to take into account the more minutes played by Ross
View attachment 47141
I’m sure more excuses will be forthcoming
I don't need excuses. Your statistical set is flawed. Does the average account for opposition played against, or style of play as directed under managers? You've made a lot of assumptions on the set in your favour and ignored he ones which don't work in your favour. Pretty clear for all to see.
Clutching at straws there homie.I don't need excuses. Your statistical set is flawed. Does the average account for opposition played against, or style of play as directed under managers? You've made a lot of assumptions on the set in your favour and ignored he ones which don't work in your favour. Pretty clear for all to see.