Gylfi has never been a player that makes teams tick.
This is what has baffled me all along about people having a go at him for not doing that.
I said it last year. Don't expect a player who comes in and runs a game. It isn't him. It never has been and never will be.
He's a hard worker who can play a few different roles but also has a real touch of quality. He operates on the edge of the final third and that's where he's at his best - finishing moves by either shooting or providing the assist. Throw into that his set-piece quality, although we hardly ever actually won a free-kick that was in that zone on the edge of the area where he'd be able to have a go at goal.
But he isn't a player who will get on the ball from deep and spread 50 yard passes or keep the play ticking over. He's the player that is ahead of the player that does that.
Which is why Rooney suddenly looked so sluggish after Gylfi's injury. Rooney was picking up the ball on our 30 yard line, to use a Rugby reference, and then had nobody in front of him making the movement that Gylfi did.
When they were playing together, we at least saw Rooney be able to get it into Gylfi and then move into space, and the link up was good. In the game against Leicester, for example, that was really prevalent, with Walcott then able to get involved as both Rooney and Gylfi moved upfield.