Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Holgate Racially Abused By Firmino - The Guardian

Status
Not open for further replies.
This 'kin scumbag in the Daily Hate Martin Samuels:





"Does not appear to have...does not seem to have".

How would that 'kin mess know?
Martin Samuels is a grotty little toerag who is doing his best to prove journalists can be as big a parasite on football as the greediest agent.

That this greasy chopped scoundrel is resorting to Barnum statements and conjecture at least implies that the FA are being tight lipped about the whole thing.
 
Martin Samuels is a grotty little toerag who is doing his best to prove journalists can be as big a parasite on football as the greediest agent.

That this greasy chopped scoundrel is resorting to Barnum statements and conjecture at least implies that the FA are being tight lipped about the whole thing.
He's attempting to influence the outcome and has been throughout. He's a racist apologist.
 
So not bothered that in 2018 a black player is still being racially abused..... But the window closing before firminho might be banned would be terrible.... What a special kind of people they are...
I bet that lad Brewster has had his eyes opened by all this.

It was said at the time he made his complaints about east European racism that he needed to look closer to home first...a LOT closer to home.
 
This 'kin scumbag in the Daily Hate Martin Samuels:





"Does not appear to have...does not seem to have".

How would that 'kin mess know?

An apologist trying to give the FA a way out of a situation they don’t want to deal with. Of course there were witnesses, of course the referee heard the exchange, why did he run over to his assistant otherwise? If the FA were inclined they can easily access countless networks tv footage to get the angle they need as evidence. Samuel hadn’t even bothered to research the timelines of similar cases.

The FA need to review all evidence and answer Holgate’s accusation one way or another. Samuel is effectively trying to pave the way for them to do nothing.
 

An apologist trying to give the FA a way out of a situation they don’t want to deal with. Of course there were witnesses, of course the referee heard the exchange, why did he run over to his assistant otherwise? If the FA were inclined they can easily access countless networks tv footage to get the angle they need as evidence. Samuel hadn’t even bothered to research the timelines of similar cases.

The FA need to review all evidence and answer Holgate’s accusation one way or another. Samuel is effectively trying to pave the way for them to do nothing.
It's all just a big misunderstanding.

Thanks, you scruffy bearded get.
 
He’s a fat bearded scruff who writes for the Daily Mail, he has zero credibility outside his massive ego
Just re-reading his earlier coverage of the incident and this:

"Make no mistake, what Holgate did at Anfield was at the extreme end of recklessness. He delivered a firm, two-handed push to the back of a player travelling at speed towards the touchline, which propelled him into and over the walled barrier surrounding the pitch. We hardly need to speculate further about any injury that could have resulted because the potential consequences are limitless."

Unreal....and if any club's players should be defended from talk of injury due to walls it's not Liverpool.
 
Just re-reading his earlier coverage of the incident and this:

"Make no mistake, what Holgate did at Anfield was at the extreme end of recklessness. He delivered a firm, two-handed push to the back of a player travelling at speed towards the touchline, which propelled him into and over the walled barrier surrounding the pitch. We hardly need to speculate further about any injury that could have resulted because the potential consequences are limitless."

Unreal....and if any club's players should be defended from talk of injury due to walls it's not Liverpool.

He’s vile, always has been but I guess that’s why he’s writing for the mail

And lol at the last paragraph, after a crap day in work that made me laugh
 

He's attempting to influence the outcome and has been throughout. He's a racist apologist.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall eavesdropping on this bottom feeder and his cronies. I think it would be very illuminating about bigoted views in the media, much more so than being an apologist for racism; I think racist apologist is a perfect summation of him after reading the quote you provided.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top