Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Holgate Racially Abused By Firmino - The Guardian

Status
Not open for further replies.
“Being subjected to such a serious allegation for this length of time has been hurtful to him (Firmino)"

...don't make hurtful comments to other people then.
Pretty much this.

Dont abuse other players and you dont get a complaint and you dont get investigated. That should be easy to follow even for a thick get like him.
 


Always the victims

That's right Bascombe. The question mark hangs over your hero and it's been placed there by the FA knowing that it will stick. That's another reason why they wouldn't condemn Holgate for bringing the complaint. They have evidence, it;s simply "insufficient" to go ahead safely with to a charge. You'll just have to make do with playing the victim card for LFC as per usual.
 
Give me the way this has been handled any day compared to the Suarez and Evra case. Is that what some of you have wanted here, a complete media circus leading to the most farcical handling of a racist complaint that trivialised the whole affair. Holgate has remained silent and dignified, Everton have remained silent and dignified and even Liverpool (probably with their behaviour from the Suarez case in the backs of their mind) have kept their gobs shut. This has been handled away from the media glare and the FA have taken their time, they haven't looked to cut corners and I think they genuinely believed Holgate's claim but without evidence what can you do? It's what separates us from the third world.

There is some proper victim cry arsing going on in here. "I wish Everton weren't pushovers", "I wish Jags wasn't such a little fanny", "I wish we had Liverpool's underhand approach" wah wah wah. This was a serious incident, and some of the nonsense on here threatens to turn the whole thing into the kind of sideshow that Suarez and Evra was - the kind of "will they shake hands" theatre that the gutter-press in this country absolutely loves.

I think some of you have been trawling through RAWK so much laughing at the RS that you've subconsciously adopted a bit of their style.
 

Some proper helmets on that. "Sky Sports" though, pretty much highlights the intelligence and mentality of the posters on there.

Bet none of them are from Merseyside either.

Phoneys.

First one is from Isle of Man.
2nd is from Preston - might be Solomon Grundy from RAWK.
3rd = ?
4th = Bristol
5th = Fake trolling account.
6th = Yank.
 
Last edited:
It’s almost like within the legal system of England and Wales people are found not guilty rather than innocent , you know as if innocent isn’t a verdict and therefore the FA judgement seems reasonable.

yeah but if they are totally innocent and proven as such, the case would be thrown out long before a "verdict" was required, which is why you don't find people judged "innocent"
 
Everybody needs to stop getting worked up.

There is no proof he was racially abused. Holgate thought he was, but I am sure (somebody correct me if I am wrong) that he doesn't speak fluent Portuguese and may easily have misheard something, and that's not a problem. Innocent mistake perhaps.

In any case, Everton should have publically defended him just like the RS did for their player. The FA took their time (too long imo, but at least they came to a conclusion) and released a statement yesterday.

Time to forget it.

Common sense. Has anyone in this thread actually read the full FA statement? Here’s an extract which everyone here seems to be ignoring:

“We took statements from a total of 12 players and officials from both teams, the match referee and the fourth official. None of these individuals directly heard the words alleged to have been said by Firmino.”

Our own players couldn’t even corroborate Holgate’s allegation. If they didn’t even hear anything then what do people want? A conviction based solely on Holgate’s word? Wake up and join the real world people as that’s not how it works.
 
The statement from the FA has basically said there’s not enough evidence to prove he did day it and not enough to prove that Mason made it up either. So in the absence we are left with whether you believe Holgate or Firmino and some of you have all too gleefully jumped on the I told you so train and backed Firmino.

Liverpool backed their player publicly before the inquiry during and after, Liverpool fans maintained their players innocence despite no evidence before during and after. Everton refuses to publicly support Holgate at any point throughout the process and some Everton fans refused to back him too, whether you like it or not this in a nutshell is the fundamental difference between the two teams. Whether it’s this incident or anything else one club and set of fans will stop at nothing to set the narrative the way they want whilst the other club is quite happy for them to do it as they have no interest in competing and as soon as fans question this lack of desire to compete they’re piped down by other fans along the lines of ‘embarassing’ ‘kopite behaviour’ etc.

The FA verdict has changed nothing. We didn’t know before what happened, and the FA have confirmed we never now will. In what should be an impasse though Liverpool backed by the media have claimed a moral victory whilst Everton have turned an impasse into a humiliation for one of their players. Anyone who points this out though is apparently a massive cringe and embarassing.
The issue I have with this is that you have no idea what has happened behind closed doors.

Did Holgate want public backing from Everton? Does he still feel that he was racially abused? We don't know, so why are we getting on the clubs case about it? You could be giving the club grief for not supporting Holgate when they're doing exactly what he asked them to do.

It's entirely plausible that Holgate believed that during a heated melee there had been a racial slur, he reported it and it was officially placed on record in the referees report. 24 hours later, somebody sits down with him and says 'Right Mason, we're going to offer you all the support in the world just tell us what you need' and he says 'well actually I don't know if that is what he said. I thought it was at the time, but Jonjoe says he thought he said something else and I suppose he might have'. Club and player then agree that they'll just let the FA look into it and not make a massive fuss because while they stand by the allegation, they're not 100% sure that it really happened.

Alternatively, maybe he is 100% sure, but he doesn't want to be a poster boy victim so that some Everton fans can take the moral high ground over the way their club handled the situation, and would rather just get on with his life without forever being referred to as 'Mason Holgate, victim of racial abuse'.

Why oh why we have to criticise the club for every single they ever do is just beyond me.
 

Nice one FA. You can bet Holgate's treatment will be in the minds of abused players in the future.

View attachment 44401
View attachment 44402
View attachment 44403
View attachment 44404
View attachment 44405
View attachment 44406

All I can conclude from this, is that there are some proper "internet warrior" types posting their ridiculous comments in that thread, a bit like there are on here though as well to be fair.

You cannot judge every case in the same way. You need to have a balanced view and not start digging the past up for each individual incident.

This is basically why idiots should not be allowed access to social media.
 
The whole scenario goes against the Liberal agenda narrative so a non-white guy was never going to be accused of racism towards another non-white guy .
 
Common sense. Has anyone in this thread actually read the full FA statement? Here’s an extract which everyone here seems to be ignoring:

“We took statements from a total of 12 players and officials from both teams, the match referee and the fourth official. None of these individuals directly heard the words alleged to have been said by Firmino.”

Our own players couldn’t even corroborate Holgate’s allegation. If they didn’t even hear anything then what do people want? A conviction based solely on Holgate’s word? Wake up and join the real world people as that’s not how it works.

This is and always was going to be the issue. There were only ever 2 people ( the ref & Jon Joe Kenny) that could have possibly heard it (not sure who the 10 would have been anyway). As the ref took no action at the time we had to assume he hadn't heard anything, so that only ever left Kenny who could have conceivably heard anything. The wording of the above also suggest to me that these 12 people didn't hear ANY of the words, regardless of what they were
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top