So what you're saying, though, is:
- I addressed a controversial claim about a major world problem that is already in the public domain
- I refuted it right off the bat
- I explained what would be necessary about the state of the world for that argument to be valid
- I got vilified for even suggesting that there might be a universe where that argument, which we all agree is false in this world, happens to be true
In a mere seven pages, we've explained what's wrong about discourse in this particular world in this particular universe. People shut down when emotionally triggered, and don't come back and reconvene later to discuss rationally what they learned from getting triggered emotionally. Instead, they make ad hominem attacks and try to shut the discourse down.
That's a lot more efficient than the novel that I've written where that is one of the themes, truth be told.