Dyche's substitution against Southampton certainly riled the crowd and he's not the first manager who's triggered that reaction. Ancelotti was not shielded entirely from criticism despite a CV that identifies him as GOAT material. Even the great Howard Kendall was questioned by the (stayaway) Goodison faithful.
Why is it that paid professionals with a lifetimes experience in the game seemingly make decisions that are quickly identified as obviously incorrect by people who haven't spent so much as a day on the books of even a semi-pro side?
Do match going blues have an intrinsic knowledge of the game garnered by a lifetime in the Park End? Or could we question the wisdom and even self-worth of people who habitually pay an extortionate sum to sit in hard plastic seats, in freezing weather, drinking overpriced hot brown water masquerading as coffee while watching and groaning at millionaires such as Michael Keane and his ilk repeatedly failing to perform to even a below middling standard?
I'd be interested as 'going the game' is often perceived by some as giving elevated status to themselves in terms of opinion and knowledge. On the other hand that willingness to be borderline extorted for such poor returns could indicate a lack of critical thinking skills thus ironically rendering their opinions and knowledge questionable at best.
The cry of 'Nil Satis Nisi Optimum' and calls for protest could be viewed as incompatible with directly funding those who repeatedly fail couldn't it? Or are those match going blues the ones who are making their voices heard unlike us keyboard warriors?
What's your take on the match going Super Bloos GOT?
Why is it that paid professionals with a lifetimes experience in the game seemingly make decisions that are quickly identified as obviously incorrect by people who haven't spent so much as a day on the books of even a semi-pro side?
Do match going blues have an intrinsic knowledge of the game garnered by a lifetime in the Park End? Or could we question the wisdom and even self-worth of people who habitually pay an extortionate sum to sit in hard plastic seats, in freezing weather, drinking overpriced hot brown water masquerading as coffee while watching and groaning at millionaires such as Michael Keane and his ilk repeatedly failing to perform to even a below middling standard?
I'd be interested as 'going the game' is often perceived by some as giving elevated status to themselves in terms of opinion and knowledge. On the other hand that willingness to be borderline extorted for such poor returns could indicate a lack of critical thinking skills thus ironically rendering their opinions and knowledge questionable at best.
The cry of 'Nil Satis Nisi Optimum' and calls for protest could be viewed as incompatible with directly funding those who repeatedly fail couldn't it? Or are those match going blues the ones who are making their voices heard unlike us keyboard warriors?
What's your take on the match going Super Bloos GOT?
