ijjysmith
Calm
Any list that doesn't have Neville Southall at number one isn't worth considering.
This.
This again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any list that doesn't have Neville Southall at number one isn't worth considering.
Ok, just found it. It's not affiliated to any official governing body.
Here is their list of all-time goalkeepers:
http://www.iffhs.de/?388d85ff8b00388f05f4cbc0385fdcdc3bfcdc0aec70aeedb88419
Here are ones that are interesting to us (and calling him "Timothy Matthew Howard"...is that really necessary?):
1. Gianluigi Buffon
2. Iker Casillas
3. Edwin van der Sar
4. Peter Schmeichel
5. Oliver Kahn
6. Petr Čech
12. Fabien Barthez
13. David Seaman
19. Jens Lehmann
26. Peter Shilton
30. Neville Southall
36. Jerzy Dudek
40. Patrick Bonner
41. Timothy Matthew Howard
42. Manuel Neuer
95. Christopher Woods
117. Nigel Martyn
Manuel Neuer is a superior keeper to Tim Howard. Nigel Martyn's place seems too low, and Howard's too high. Southall should be top 10.
Whatever the IFFHS are basing their rankings on, it's not necessarily related to the reality.
Er yeah, that lists seems to claim Jens Lehman and Fabian Barthez were better than Neville Southall and Tim Howard is better than Manuel Neur so I think we can ignore that.
Also, I don't see how people can claim the opinions in this thread have nothing to do with nationality when the general theme is Americans defending/promoting him and everyone else disagreeing.
I've never really rated Howard. I'm old enough to remember Neville Southall in his prime, but also remember as far back as Dai "Dropsy" Davies costing us the title in 1974/75.
Howard is a great shot stopper, as he has great reflexes, and this is why some people rate him. It's when the ball's in the air, or he has more time to think, that he's lacking, i.e. crosses and shots from distance. The number of times he stays rooted on his line when crosses come into his 6 yard box, or just outside, is untrue, and I'm not talking brilliant crosses, I'm talking crosses hit from deep, which hang in the air, so he's got plenty of time to think about it. For example, Norwich's injury time equaliser at Goodison this season.
For shots from long range, he seems to take an eternity to sort his feet out, and does this manic little shuffle with his feet, before finally diving, often too late, e.g. Lampard's winner in the 2009 cup final always sticks in my mind for obvious reasons. I can think of lots of occasions this season, and previous seasons, where he's cost us points time and time again. In my opinion, the keeper is the most vital position in the team, and Howard is not the answer and never has been.
As for that website link to a list of "all-time" best keepers someone posted, it obviously only takes into account the Premier League era. Dudek at no.36?? Bonner at no. 40??? Are they having a laugh? As for the best keepers of all time, what about Gordon Banks, Lev Yashin, Dino Zoff, Sepp Maier?
poor season from Howard, but he seemingly figured it out in the last 10 games or so
on the list of things we need improving though, I think the ability to score goals is what can take us over the hump back to Europe/Champs League more than replacing Howard
Howard certainly made mistakes this year (some of you say 8, some say 10 or even 13), but how many games did we dominate the ball, but we couldn't score. We need a world class striker(s) to carry us into the next level.
If we had 20mil to spend (I realize we don't just bare with me), I'd rather keep Howard and spend it on offense than keep our offense and go get a new goalie.
Lastly, Everton gave up 40 goals this year, some of you are suggesting, with a proper goalie, we would have given up less than 30. That seems kinda crazy
And once again...location of the poster has nothing to do with is.
What's least shocking is that he nailed a vast section of the "support" to a tee.
He was at fault for both the goals on Sunday IMO, he could have done better with the second, to beat at your near post is always gonna be your fault to some degree. Unless it's a stunner.
He's made some bad mistakes this season. Stoke, Newcastle, Norwich and Fulham spring to mind. The goals he conceded in the game were awful. We drew those games so it could have been an extra 11 points, including a possible win at Chelsea, which would have put us in Europe.
Obviously it is by no means certain that we would have won those games without him conceding those goals but you never know.