And I think that is the correct use of practise as opposed to practice.
However, it needs to be circumvent not circumnavigate which was more a Walter Raleigh thing...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I think that is the correct use of practise as opposed to practice.
Think PSR has fried everyone's brains into thinking everything is about PSR and PSR only. Villa fans in particular seem to think everything they do now is a genius PSR workaround. Seen some producing all sorts of amortisation / book value calculations to show that selling Philogene for 5m then buying him for 14m is actually a profit. Seeing everything through the prism of PSR seems to distort reality.
Me too mate, we have alot of work to do this summer and I was hoping we would know something by now, I want us to just walk away tbh, hopefully we have other targets lined up.I thought this would have been resolved by now.
Is it clever? in the world of PSR, bringing him back he now wont be pure profit if they were to sell him?That's tremendously clever from villa. Fair play.
Fair enough mate, know we discussed this a bit the other day and it can be viewed in different ways I guess. I've seen much wilder stuff from amateur accountancy experts on Twitter, not just Villa fans, Chelsea fans are crazy for amortisation and the like and it all just gets a bit silly. Just making the point that viewing things purely through PSR and accountancy you can lose track of the reality of deals. End of the day if you make more money than you spend the rest takes care of itself.No. its not that its a profit but that it covers the accounts for PSR in the short term. The buy back will need to deduct the 30% sell on so in effect it will be around a net 9m outlay which is amortised again for PSR. Is it a loss? Yes, in terms of paying money out of course it is. But we have a net gain on the accounts, and only need to get more than 9m in any resale to have made money out of him twice, and then being in PSR compliance thanks to the deal(s).
Think a bit of premature ejaculation from the ITKs have made people think its closer than expected.I thought this would have been resolved by now.
Fair enough mate, know we discussed this a bit the other day and it can be viewed in different ways I guess. I've seen much wilder stuff from amateur accountancy experts on Twitter, not just Villa fans, Chelsea fans are crazy for amortisation and the like and it all just gets a bit silly. Just making the point that viewing things purely through PSR and accountancy you can lose track of the reality of deals. End of the day if you make more money than you spend the rest takes care of itself.
Perfect encapsulation of PSR that clubs can be making deals that are long-term lossmaking but be seen as clever because of a short-term PSR boost. Bit like Chelsea's long-term contract workaround, all sorts of tricks that in the long term are neither profitable nor sustainable, yet they are being used to satisfy the profitability and sustainability rules.Cashflow may not be an issue, but PSR can hamper you financially and it seems they are on the edge.
We lost what 12-16 mill with our points deductions just on PL money, whatever in legal fees and what ever secondary impact on commercial deals and possibly credit with the reputational damage and threat of relegation.
Maybe from Villa point of view its worth spending a bit of their cash flow in avoiding all that and gaming the threshold, while also allowing them access quality players - overall they can resale those players so at worse its net 0 eventually.
Perfect encapsulation of PSR that clubs can be making deals that are long-term lossmaking but be seen as clever because of a short-term PSR boost. Bit like Chelsea's long-term contract workaround, all sorts of tricks that in the long term are neither profitable nor sustainable, yet they are being used to satisfy the profitability and sustainability rules.
no we love speculation, it's what get's us through the dayget rid of thread not coming
Indeed. Bids supposedly accepted from multiple clubs, agent doing whistle stop tour of training ground car parks, and yet the player now doing bleep tests at Hulls pre-season camp after initially staying in the UK. They have said they don’t need to sell, but if bids really accepted and the player is deciding, would seem very odd to risk injury (although they are still paying him).Strange how quiet this has gone. You'd hope the 3 clubs will have given the player and his buffoon of an agent a deadline to make a decision