I mentioned this in the WBA thread at half time, and Davek seems to have echoed my thoughts earlier here.
The problem isn't necessarily with James' play, but in my opinion is more to do with the positions he has been required to take up this season. When playing with Mirallas and McGeady he is sitting deeper than usual as both are under special instructions not requiring them to track back all the time. Couple that with the way Baines and Coleman get up to support the attack, and the fact that Naismith is playing further up than Barkley would and you can see why McCarthy is hesitant to push further up.
At points in the game we had 5 players just clustered on the half-way line while we attempting to maintain possession/start an attack ( McCarthy, Barry, Jags, Stones, and then one of Baines/Coleman depending on which flank we were attacking down.) This led to the entire team looking disjointed(With an "Attacking" 5 and a "Defending" 5) and gave WBA the ability to take the ball through the middle of the park when counter-attacking.
If Pienaar and Barkley were in the team I think you would see more of McCarthy getting involved on the ball further up the pitch like he did last year. He knew Barkley and Pienaar were going to track back when countered. I think the special instructions for tracking back given to Mirallas and McGeady, and Naismith playing more as a second striker than an attacking mid has led to instructions for McCarthy to sit deeper. I can't think of many touches McCarthy got in the final third of the field against WBA and I think this is why.
The problem isn't necessarily with James' play, but in my opinion is more to do with the positions he has been required to take up this season. When playing with Mirallas and McGeady he is sitting deeper than usual as both are under special instructions not requiring them to track back all the time. Couple that with the way Baines and Coleman get up to support the attack, and the fact that Naismith is playing further up than Barkley would and you can see why McCarthy is hesitant to push further up.
At points in the game we had 5 players just clustered on the half-way line while we attempting to maintain possession/start an attack ( McCarthy, Barry, Jags, Stones, and then one of Baines/Coleman depending on which flank we were attacking down.) This led to the entire team looking disjointed(With an "Attacking" 5 and a "Defending" 5) and gave WBA the ability to take the ball through the middle of the park when counter-attacking.
If Pienaar and Barkley were in the team I think you would see more of McCarthy getting involved on the ball further up the pitch like he did last year. He knew Barkley and Pienaar were going to track back when countered. I think the special instructions for tracking back given to Mirallas and McGeady, and Naismith playing more as a second striker than an attacking mid has led to instructions for McCarthy to sit deeper. I can't think of many touches McCarthy got in the final third of the field against WBA and I think this is why.