January Transfer Thread 2017

[Connor]

This would be a valid argument if we were producing fewer goals than last season, because it would clearly indicate that the more defensive setup has affected our offensive output, but the fact is it hasn't:

View attachment 34041

So in common matches, we've produced the exact same number of goals for while conceding 14 fewer goals (a 40% decrease in goals conceded). And somehow this is a negative in your eyes.

Next time mate, use some lube.

That is ruthless.

 

[roydo]

Next time mate, use some lube.

That is ruthless.

lol

 

[Nymzee]

This would be a valid argument if we were producing fewer goals than last season, because it would clearly indicate that the more defensive setup has affected our offensive output, but the fact is it hasn't:

View attachment 34041

So in common matches, we've produced the exact same number of goals for while conceding 14 fewer goals (a 40% decrease in goals conceded). And somehow this is a negative in your eyes.

You went in dry there pal.

 

[Amw79]

This would be a valid argument if we were producing fewer goals than last season, because it would clearly indicate that the more defensive setup has affected our offensive output, but the fact is it hasn't:

View attachment 34041

So in common matches, we've produced the exact same number of goals for while conceding 14 fewer goals (a 40% decrease in goals conceded). And somehow this is a negative in your eyes.

Devastating. Hooray for cold, hard statistics!

 

[Darth Toffeeman]

This would be a valid argument if we were producing fewer goals than last season, because it would clearly indicate that the more defensive setup has affected our offensive output, but the fact is it hasn't:

View attachment 34041

So in common matches, we've produced the exact same number of goals for while conceding 14 fewer goals (a 40% decrease in goals conceded). And somehow this is a negative in your eyes.

Man U home we scored 0 conceded 3.
So the stats are even more favourable as that result is flipped.

 

[tmgc]

This would be a valid argument if we were producing fewer goals than last season, because it would clearly indicate that the more defensive setup has affected our offensive output, but the fact is it hasn't:

View attachment 34041

So in common matches, we've produced the exact same number of goals for while conceding 14 fewer goals (a 40% decrease in goals conceded). And somehow this is a negative in your eyes.

Unbelievable....he's only gone and wiped his bellend on Daveks ma's curtains Jeff.

 

[zandvoort blue]

The gallant "Defender of the Indefensible", that morphed into the "Assailer of the Inassailable" getting smacked all over the shop

Anyways, good window IMHO

 

[Famous_Seamus]

Man U home we scored 0 conceded 3.
So the stats are even more favourable as that result is flipped.

You are correct, that was my mistake. revised is below and I double checked the others now too... Perhaps subconsciously I felt a bit sorry for dave didn't want to embarass him that much.

 

[bluestevon]

You are correct, that was my mistake. revised is below and I double checked the others now too... Perhaps subconsciously I felt a bit sorry for dave didn't want to embarass him that much.

View attachment 34043

Dave's now praying for a 19-0 stoke win tonight before responding.

 

[Connor]

You are correct, that was my mistake. revised is below and I double checked the others now too... Perhaps subconsciously I felt a bit sorry for dave didn't want to embarass him that much.

View attachment 34043

Stop mate, please. Show him a modicum of Mercy.

 

[Verbal Kint]

Oh sorry mate, wasn't I supposed to use ALL the stats?

I was told earlier I was being selective with cherry picking examples of defensive tardiness, so i thought I'd get round that accusation by throwing the whole of the data in.

Apparently that's not credible either.

Un-be-kin-lievable.

What's unbelievable is you refuse to believe we haven't improved defensively MATE

 

[davek]

What's unbelievable is you refuse to believe we haven't improved defensively MATE

Baines, Coleman, Jagielka all as hopeless as they were positionally speaking. Williams hardly the massive improvement we all thought we we were getting.

If you think that back four are responsible for any less goals being shipped you are living on fantasy island.

 

[Goat]

Baines, Coleman, Jagielka all as hopeless as they were positionally speaking. Williams hardly the massive improvement we all thought we we were getting.

If you think that back four are responsible for any less goals being shipped you are living on fantasy island.

Is it the wind Dave?

 

[Dario Terracotta]

You went in dry there pal.

Bungle laaaadddddlollollol

 

[bluestevon]

Baines, Coleman, Jagielka all as hopeless as they were positionally speaking. Williams hardly the massive improvement we all thought we we were getting.

If you think that back four are responsible for any less goals being shipped you are living on fantasy island.

Then it's down to coaching and tactics, as shown we are scoring more as well, so what does that say about the previous levels of coaching and tactics David?