billyblue80
Player Valuation: £70m
Qué thousands of blerts who had never heard of the lad til last week selling him to another club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't you say he's conceded 237 goals in the last 24 months? Or was it 273?
Double your money offer comes in.
Would you cash in?
All depends on who Brands has lined up to reinvest the money on. He would not be doing his job if he didn't consider it.
Selling our best asset shouldnt part of his job, selling the deadwood yes, he has enough to do without having to find another keeper
That is such a narrow view though. We have problems all over the pitch. Whether it be bang average to not good enough to past it players.
FFP rules mean we can't City our way to progress. So either we hit big with a couple of young players (see Kane and Dele), or we do the smart business if silly money comes in.
We did the right thing not selling Stones, because it appeared we possibly were heading in the right direction. Well it all went pear shaped.
Correct, we have big problems, and it will take more then one or two windows to sort, but to start again on the one place that is now sorted is the worst thing we can do. No amount of crazy money for one player is going to help, besides for the squad, we tried the throwing money at it thing last season, it never works.
I think we did the right thing selling Stones when we did and got top money for him, but its not so easy with a keeper, City it took a while to find a decent one and Liverpool have had no luck for years, weve got lucky with Pickford with Howard going at the same time they went down, last thing we want to do is ruin that good fortune with a pointless sale
You have to keep your best players and build not sell at the first sniff. Look at Spurs they only started progressing when they were shrewd and kept their best players and built the squad around that.
I can see where your coming from mate but i just cant see it working, selling Lukaku didnt work but we had to sell him, to sell a player who dont have to sell for any amount of money from a football buisness sense would be just wrong, he really is our only star player.Look I don't want to sell him but if Brands gets a £60 mil bid AND he has a replacement he rates at a much lower valuation that he is confident he can get it would make no sense to not sell. He could then use the rest of the money on other players he rates possibly solving 3 places in the squad by selling 1.
They cashed in on Bale.
They did but that was only after it was clear he wanted to leave and they got maximum fee. He was their last big sale and since Potch came in they have progressed year on year with a different strategy.
I can see where your coming from mate but i just cant see it working, selling Lukaku didnt work but we had to sell him, to sell a player who dont have to sell for any amount of money from a football buisness sense would be just wrong, he really is our only star player.