Lobster Johnson
Player Valuation: £35m
Great news. If only to make @TheBigIguana 's head drop off
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £25m
One of the best keepers in the league, easily.
Good news for us, and a good sign he wants to stay, clubs like Tottenham would definitely be in for him in the summer so fair play to him.
Good news for us, and a good sign he wants to stay, clubs like Tottenham would definitely be in for him in the summer so fair play to him.
everton1953
Player Valuation: £40m
Good news.
Really excellent news.
He's a brilliant keeper, one of our only bankable stars, and to have him commit to the club sends a much-needed message that we're not a basket case and other players ought to consider us.
He's a brilliant keeper, one of our only bankable stars, and to have him commit to the club sends a much-needed message that we're not a basket case and other players ought to consider us.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
I guess if we do get relegated it's clearly in his interests and ours for him to leave so there's no real need for a clause to make it happen. I suspect though this means there is a general release clause, which if sensibly set is fine.
1st Year and last season as well.
windymiller
Player Valuation: £60m
That can't be true. In all honesty a relegation clause would suit both parties, I can't see why there wouldn't be one. We couldn't support his wages if we went down and a clause would ease his departure. I'm glad he's signing up but without a drop clause for transfer I'm assuming there's also no wage reduction clause either, which is high risk given our position.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
Yeah but as I said above, if we do go down it's so obviously in his interests to leave, and in our interest to sell & remove him from the wage bill, that a relegation clause almost becomes redundant. What would it do that both parties wouldn't be seeking to do anyway?
windymiller
Player Valuation: £60m
I guess it would set a price for buyers that was written in stone and may facilitate a quick move. Obviously we could set an asking price but it may get bogged down in negotiations and there's only a limited number of teams looking for a no. 1. I suspect we'd have no problems moving him on but you never know, Sunderland were stuck with a load of high earners they couldn't shift, if we go down we may well be in the same boat.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
I guess, but with a clause like that if you set it too high no one will pay it and since we're forced sellers we have to take a lower offer, or you set it below what the market will pay and you get mugged off. So it's only really a benefit if it's set at the correct market value, in which case you don't really need it anyway.
windymiller
Player Valuation: £60m
Hopefully it's all an irrelevance!
Pittsburgh Footy
Player Valuation: £35m
While this is true, they didn't have the clear starting goalkeeper for England in their side.
Because of Pickford's status with the national team, and performances internationally, this is much less of a risk for us.
And he's still relatively young for a goalkeeper
TrailerTrash
Player Valuation: £8m
I don't see how any of this could possibly be true, as contract Dave left.
It's not possible to sign anything now. No new contracts, nothing. Just entropy until it all ends.
(Has his new contract been confirmed by the club yet?)
It's not possible to sign anything now. No new contracts, nothing. Just entropy until it all ends.
(Has his new contract been confirmed by the club yet?)
- Status