orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
hahahahah lol
at least a minute of that is him winning basic headers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if we kept signing a team of Gibsons, Cleverleys, Barry's, Williams's etc? Would we win anything with them?Because we have not got an unlimited pot of money to spend and certainly within FFP, spending 50 million plus on one player is going to have a bigger impact in recruitment in other positions.
but as my original point stands, what if he doesn't adapt? We spend more on him for example and he fails, like Mangala and Otemendi has at City, they can sell for a loss and move on, it would have a much bigger impact to us financially to have that price of failure at the club.
but as i said to Zatara above, is he that good? no big clubs moved for him last summer and if they do not this season either then why aren't teams interested in this world class defender as zatara put it like, who is available for transfer? Real Madrid bought Bale simply because he was available, no ambition with him other than a potentially top class player available for signing so they put the money up.
I don't get this attitude though, we would love to spend that amount of money so we should? It is almost fantasy based attitudes, especially when the whole squad needs rebuilding, not just signing a big centre half and thinking everyone will be ok.What if we kept signing a team of Gibsons, Cleverleys, Barry's, Williams's etc? Would we win anything with them?
And I'm pretty sure Bale was only available once Real Madrid broke the transfer world record.
Chelsea were/are apparently in for this guy, and to be frank being able to splash 50 odd million on a player is something myself and probably countless Evertonians have always wanted to be able to see because it is so far away from spending peanuts on the usual dross we have bought in the past two decades.
hahahahah lol
at least a minute of that is him winning basic headers
So there seems to be a schism here where some rate him very highly and some don't rate him at all
I'm going to assume the truth lurks somewhere in between
I haven't watched a full Napoli game since probably the 90's, so I couldn't really say
He's being carried by Maradona
Does he show up to training in a DeLorean?
So there seems to be a schism here where some rate him very highly and some don't rate him at all
I'm going to assume the truth lurks somewhere in between
I haven't watched a full Napoli game since probably the 90's, so I couldn't really say
I don't get this attitude though, we would love to spend that amount of money so we should? It is almost fantasy based attitudes, especially when the whole squad needs rebuilding, not just signing a big centre half and thinking everyone will be ok.
I think you miss the point i am making in regards to signing players. It isn't a case of signing average players, it is not flashing a load of cash and pretending to be one of the big boys with our one prized possession. It is about building a squad not just a team to compete with the teams at the top. financially signing 3 20 million pound players rather than one 60 million pound one might be seen as buying worse players but with proper scouting before hand, those 3 players might be worth 60 million themselves after 2 years and 3 important positions have got competition in them as a result.
And for another point whilst it is still on my mind, why is this Koulibaby worth 60 million? I know that is the asking price for him set by the club but is he actually worth it? compared to other defenders? Or would signing 60 million pound defenders like him be more of an example of the club massively overspending for the sake of it? A bit like bidding 70 million for Payet, he is good sure but worth 70 million? Just because West ham say he is? would we be better signing 25 million player who could be better than him in the future and sign a better goal keeper with the rest of the 70, for example?
( i know payet is not at west ham, just an example)
I have been under the impression we only have a limited budget in terms of FFP therefore we cannot spend 150 million in a window without making the proportion of that back in sales. More so with european football, can't remember how but i am sure the rules get a little stricter again.Depends what you want Everton to be doesn't it?
I dare say a lot would like to see us spend £50m on a player because frankly if we did that we would join 3 teams in this league who have ever done so, United, Chelsea, City - and from a supporter that would signal just how different things now are at the club and its ambition for the future.
Is Koulibaly worth it, well, he's proven in CL and at a good side, he's at his peak age with all his best years ahead, Conte who knows that league and who knows a defender deemed him worth bidding 40+ million on last summer, Napoli deemed him worth more and rejected the multiple bids. And Stones went for 50m as did Luiz, and VVD has at least that price on his head, so in reality, yes he is worth that amount to a team that wants and needs that level of proven player.
As for why we should do a signing such as that, rather tha sign 2-3 20m players, because signing players in that range is even more of a gamble usually, overall all it does is give you a good squad at best usually, you pay for the level your aiming for, which is why Liverpool and arsenal dont challenge for leagues.
You do seem to think the options sign one player for lots and then nothing else though, how about the chance we can do both?
Koulibaby is not world class zatara. If he was world class he would have better clubs than us going in for him.
oooh..his face is all shimmery, lovely
I know right? I must have wiped my screen 26 times today...
oh...