Apologies if you feel condesenttion, that’s not my intention. I am however replying to a debate, i didn’t instigate bout a post I made months back and asked to defend the DOF if he doesn’t sign a centre forward, despite signing a centre forward. To be honest it’s a bit weird. I’m trying to understand your point of view and be kind to be honest.
You literally said, Thelwell was my man, you go on to criticise him so you present the lines for and against - that’s binary, in or out. I said I had some admiration and sympathy for him working,in limited resources, limits and poor governance and I do. I’m more open minded on him tbh rather than for or against, I’m actually skeptical about the role full stop to be truthful. I definitely think a DOF needs three windows. So we ultimately land back at not signing a centre forward, yet we signed two, but they don’t count because I don’t like them, we’re not making progress.
Your judgement on our signing is fine, they will play out so either the DOF has brought in what you describe as essentially rubbish or has just built an offensive unit and added vital cover for essentially no kney, when we don’t have any. it will all play pit nothing surer!