don't bother I can do it...all together lids, starts with P rhymes with hiss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
don't bother I can do it...all together lids, starts with P rhymes with hiss
There are 35,000 shares @200M = 5,714 per share, when you paid between 875-1300 per share...and up to now it hasn't cost you 1 extra penny??
They'll be trampled in the rush.
#alltheirchristmasescomeatonce.
Kenwright @9044 shares
Woods @6622 Shares
Earl @8146 Shares
Last edited:
anton66
Player Valuation: £50m
Might arouse some interest from the Arabs now.
Going on past form I might say they want in before the next big sky deal and will look at stick or twist options before the one after that.
A
AJC5
Guest
I'm a banking lawyer rather than a corporate lawyer but this doesn't sound right to me. Will consult PLC.
Taff
Player Valuation: £1m
People are questioning why the club is only worth circa 200m when 3 of our top players are worth over half that.
Trouble with valuing our club based on players is: they are only a poor run of form or bad injury away from halving in price. Therefore - although I'm sure players value is taken into consideration - I don't think it's taken as seriously as other factors.
From what I understand, an investment is generally made on the premise of making at least a 10% yield.
So if you bought Everton for 200m then you'd be looking to make 20m each year. In 10 years you'd have paid off the initial capital you put in and begin to reap the benefits or reinvest.
I imagine EFC are probably only making 20m per annum and i'd be surprised if that wasn't always entirely reinvested each year.
Trouble with valuing our club based on players is: they are only a poor run of form or bad injury away from halving in price. Therefore - although I'm sure players value is taken into consideration - I don't think it's taken as seriously as other factors.
From what I understand, an investment is generally made on the premise of making at least a 10% yield.
So if you bought Everton for 200m then you'd be looking to make 20m each year. In 10 years you'd have paid off the initial capital you put in and begin to reap the benefits or reinvest.
I imagine EFC are probably only making 20m per annum and i'd be surprised if that wasn't always entirely reinvested each year.
bluestevon
Player Valuation: £80m
Are they asset strippers though?
Baseball team is no worse off now than it was when owned by the current Liverpool owners - in fact could say it was massively better off and they have a fantastic stadium
Do you realistically expect us to be bought by 'football people' mate? How many of the current owners around the premiership are actually football people with enough money to do anything - had 20 years of a football person in charge and rather try someone who was a businessman.
A
AJC5
Guest
You have to take any debt into account as well which is deducted from the value of our assets to give the clubs net asset value. Although investors in the PE world would generally use a combination of EBITDA multiple/discounted cash flow to value a business rather taxable profit.
Think it's referring to part 26 CA 2006. Not 100% that it applies to private companies.
Last edited:
....I voted for change, sure it's a risk but so is our current hand to mouth existance. We are a bad manager away from being in the same situation as Villa, we need investment, we need a business savvy board.
Perhaps because they intend to invest a lot in to playing staff and Goodison.
Right couple of things
1. If the board agreed to sell carpet baggers who had previous then what does that tell you about the people who own our club! Absolute rubbish is being written here about the current board protecting the clubs future when it comes to selling. Joe Anderson would do well to keep an eye on track records of those seeking ownership of the club.
2. Mouts Goat, DaveK are absolutely right it feels and smells bad here is a quote from Peter Scudamore from the recent David Conn article aout the US deals for PL cubs of late ! Richard Scudamore, the Premier League’s chief executive in whose tenure so many clubs have been sold, has described the Swansea structure as “probably ideal”. Their trust is a reminder of heartfelt resistance to accepting football clubs as financial investments, that supporters still consider them homes of mutual belonging, to be cherished, not exploited.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/dec/23/everton-us-investors-john-moores-charles-noell
3. Lay of Watched Toffee - he is the only one who had a pair to generate public debate on the ownership of our club without cowering to media lawyers.
Finally has anyone stopped to wonder why now in the space of a 6 months we have become actually available for sale? A lot more will come out on that point later I am sure but It tells me that this club was never for sale under this ownership because of the selfishness of a few to keep control of a train set by any means necessary.
1. If the board agreed to sell carpet baggers who had previous then what does that tell you about the people who own our club! Absolute rubbish is being written here about the current board protecting the clubs future when it comes to selling. Joe Anderson would do well to keep an eye on track records of those seeking ownership of the club.
2. Mouts Goat, DaveK are absolutely right it feels and smells bad here is a quote from Peter Scudamore from the recent David Conn article aout the US deals for PL cubs of late ! Richard Scudamore, the Premier League’s chief executive in whose tenure so many clubs have been sold, has described the Swansea structure as “probably ideal”. Their trust is a reminder of heartfelt resistance to accepting football clubs as financial investments, that supporters still consider them homes of mutual belonging, to be cherished, not exploited.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/dec/23/everton-us-investors-john-moores-charles-noell
3. Lay of Watched Toffee - he is the only one who had a pair to generate public debate on the ownership of our club without cowering to media lawyers.
Finally has anyone stopped to wonder why now in the space of a 6 months we have become actually available for sale? A lot more will come out on that point later I am sure but It tells me that this club was never for sale under this ownership because of the selfishness of a few to keep control of a train set by any means necessary.
The Esk
Player Valuation: £70m
Heard on TalkS**** this morning that a Jordanian billionaire is keen to buy a Premiership club. Not just buy into for profit but actually buy and invest - seemingly these guys do it for personal kudos rather than to make money. A case of 'my wanger is bigger than yours!'. Could be that the interest of the Yanks may now promote alternative interest from the Middle East? As alluded to previously by The Esk in an earlier post I can imagine this would, however, promote a bidding war which would only benefit the current board members who would be rubbing their hands at such a prospect.
toffee_laura
Player Valuation: £1m
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ying-Premier-League-or-Championship-club.html
This what you were on about??
This what you were on about??
- Status