Calvin Aldi
Player Valuation: £950k
Mbappes wages would destroy their structure. He gets something like 450 grand a week at PSG.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mbappes wages would destroy their structure. He gets something like 450 grand a week at PSG.
it is an interesting claim that you make about them being the best ever team to play the game buddy. v bold of u.Of all the records I’ve seen bandied about today, this one stands out for me:
Taken 100 points from the last 102 available.
It’s a surreal figure. It’s FIFA (or even better PES) cheat mode.
And the team doing it are on the verge of being champions of England, Europe and the world. They will have held the lot. There’s no “but they didn’t win such and such”. They are doing this having finished runners up with 97 points last season, and won the CL having got to the final the year before. They keep coming again and again.
Others have watched them plenty more than me (just twice live all season) and would be able to give better judgement, but from what i have seen they have perfect balance of attack and defence. Solid in goal, central defence, holding midfield, ultra attacking in the full back positions, press the life out of teams in midfield, and a front three that run riot (two fast wide players who also score for fun, and a creative maverick figure in between who also links the attack with the midfield). The sole thing they are lacking over other great sides is a world class attacking midfielder...but even then, Coutinho was that for them, but the balance was too attacking with him in the team, so they conceded more.
Flaws in other teams considered great are far more glaring.
The City team under Pep can be flaky (the only coach with a better head to head record over Pep, Klopp’s teams have always caused his problems). Pep focuses heavily on ball retention as his best form of defence. An opponent that presses his teams gets the most joy by exposing that soft underbelly, which Klopp’s teams have consistently done. His Barca side (the best club team ever IMO), their defence was never a great one. Mascherano...a midget holding midfielder playing central defence, Valdes in nets, decent, but far from top class, Dani Alves...amazing in attack, but playing so high up often left space in behind, but just wasn’t exploited. Even Pique could look like Bambi on ice against a quick forward. In Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets Barca (and Spain) had arguably the greatest central midfield ever assembled...certainly the best at playing keep ball, meaning the backline was rarely called upon. Without that midfield though, a Pep team can be exposed (his Bayern side getting mauled in the CL, his Man City side losing 5-1 over two legs in the CL to the RS). As I said, Pep’s teams, never great defensively. No CL final appearance in almost a decade for him since Xavi and Iniesta took him there.
The Arsenal “invincibles” with their 12 draws and Pires diving for one of those. Again, similar to Pep, emphasis on attack. Soft underbelly. Routinely dumped out of the CL at the last 16 stage. Wenger inherited George Graham’s well drilled defence, which allied with his great attacking nous gave him the foundation for his first two league titles. For the defensive bedrock of the third and last one, Sol Campbell on a free came gift wrapped. He got away with a midfielder in Lauren playing in defence, not in the CL though. For the next 15 years he showed himself incapable of creating a solid defensive unit.
None of the United teams of the 90s I’d put in the same class of this Liverpool team, Pep’s City or ‘04 Arsenal, certainly not the early ones when the PL was largely just made up of domestic players and managers unlike today. Winning the league with 78 points where your challengers were the tactical might of Roy Evans, “I’d love it’ Keegan, big fat Ron, Howard Wilkinson etc. No wonder Fergie pissed it, during which time he got schooled by Cruyff (4-0 hiding stands out), Lippi, Hitzfeld and Capello in the CL. Fergie vs Klopp, Pep and co is a different ball game to Evans, Keegan, Fat Ron et al. The best United side was 2008, but it would need to be combined with the late 90s midfield to get Fergie’s best XI.
Statistics and trophies say this RS side is the best from these isles (certainly in the PL era). Mentioned before but they have so many similarities with AC Milan of the early 90s, RS last three seasons, 1.CL Finalists, 2.CL winners (PL 97 pts), 3.25 PL games unbeaten 24 wins. They haven’t lost a 2 legged European tie in 4 years, and are unbeaten at home in the league since April 2017. Home, abroad, they do it. It’s the same machine like characteristic of that Milan side.
Of all the records I’ve seen bandied about today, this one stands out for me:
Taken 100 points from the last 102 available.
It’s a surreal figure. It’s FIFA (or even better PES) cheat mode.
And the team doing it are on the verge of being champions of England, Europe and the world. They will have held the lot. There’s no “but they didn’t win such and such”. They are doing this having finished runners up with 97 points last season, and won the CL having got to the final the year before. They keep coming again and again.
Others have watched them plenty more than me (just twice live all season) and would be able to give better judgement, but from what i have seen they have perfect balance of attack and defence. Solid in goal, central defence, holding midfield, ultra attacking in the full back positions, press the life out of teams in midfield, and a front three that run riot (two fast wide players who also score for fun, and a creative maverick figure in between who also links the attack with the midfield). The sole thing they are lacking over other great sides is a world class attacking midfielder...but even then, Coutinho was that for them, but the balance was too attacking with him in the team, so they conceded more.
Flaws in other teams considered great are far more glaring.
The City team under Pep can be flaky (the only coach with a better head to head record over Pep, Klopp’s teams have always caused his problems). Pep focuses heavily on ball retention as his best form of defence. An opponent that presses his teams gets the most joy by exposing that soft underbelly, which Klopp’s teams have consistently done. His Barca side (the best club team ever IMO), their defence was never a great one. Mascherano...a midget holding midfielder playing central defence, Valdes in nets, decent, but far from top class, Dani Alves...amazing in attack, but playing so high up often left space in behind, but just wasn’t exploited. Even Pique could look like Bambi on ice against a quick forward. In Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets Barca (and Spain) had arguably the greatest central midfield ever assembled...certainly the best at playing keep ball, meaning the backline was rarely called upon. Without that midfield though, a Pep team can be exposed (his Bayern side getting mauled in the CL, his Man City side losing 5-1 over two legs in the CL to the RS). As I said, Pep’s teams, never great defensively. No CL final appearance in almost a decade for him since Xavi and Iniesta took him there.
The Arsenal “invincibles” with their 12 draws and Pires diving for one of those. Again, similar to Pep, emphasis on attack. Soft underbelly. Routinely dumped out of the CL at the last 16 stage. Wenger inherited George Graham’s well drilled defence, which allied with his great attacking nous gave him the foundation for his first two league titles. For the defensive bedrock of the third and last one, Sol Campbell on a free came gift wrapped. He got away with a midfielder in Lauren playing in defence, not in the CL though. For the next 15 years he showed himself incapable of creating a solid defensive unit.
None of the United teams of the 90s I’d put in the same class of this Liverpool team, Pep’s City or ‘04 Arsenal, certainly not the early ones when the PL was largely just made up of domestic players and managers unlike today. Winning the league with 78 points where your challengers were the tactical might of Roy Evans, “I’d love it’ Keegan, big fat Ron, Howard Wilkinson etc. No wonder Fergie pissed it, during which time he got schooled by Cruyff (4-0 hiding stands out), Lippi, Hitzfeld and Capello in the CL. Fergie vs Klopp, Pep and co is a different ball game to Evans, Keegan, Fat Ron et al. The best United side was 2008, but it would need to be combined with the late 90s midfield to get Fergie’s best XI.
Statistics and trophies say this RS side is the best from these isles (certainly in the PL era). Mentioned before but they have so many similarities with AC Milan of the early 90s, RS last three seasons, 1.CL Finalists, 2.CL winners (PL 97 pts), 3.25 PL games unbeaten 24 wins. They haven’t lost a 2 legged European tie in 4 years, and are unbeaten at home in the league since April 2017. Home, abroad, they do it. It’s the same machine like characteristic of that Milan side.
way off the mark both united triple PL teams are better than this current liverpool sideOf all the records I’ve seen bandied about today, this one stands out for me:
Taken 100 points from the last 102 available.
It’s a surreal figure. It’s FIFA (or even better PES) cheat mode.
And the team doing it are on the verge of being champions of England, Europe and the world. They will have held the lot. There’s no “but they didn’t win such and such”. They are doing this having finished runners up with 97 points last season, and won the CL having got to the final the year before. They keep coming again and again.
Others have watched them plenty more than me (just twice live all season) and would be able to give better judgement, but from what i have seen they have perfect balance of attack and defence. Solid in goal, central defence, holding midfield, ultra attacking in the full back positions, press the life out of teams in midfield, and a front three that run riot (two fast wide players who also score for fun, and a creative maverick figure in between who also links the attack with the midfield). The sole thing they are lacking over other great sides is a world class attacking midfielder...but even then, Coutinho was that for them, but the balance was too attacking with him in the team, so they conceded more.
Flaws in other teams considered great are far more glaring.
The City team under Pep can be flaky (the only coach with a better head to head record over Pep, Klopp’s teams have always caused his problems). Pep focuses heavily on ball retention as his best form of defence. An opponent that presses his teams gets the most joy by exposing that soft underbelly, which Klopp’s teams have consistently done. His Barca side (the best club team ever IMO), their defence was never a great one. Mascherano...a midget holding midfielder playing central defence, Valdes in nets, decent, but far from top class, Dani Alves...amazing in attack, but playing so high up often left space in behind, but just wasn’t exploited. Even Pique could look like Bambi on ice against a quick forward. In Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets Barca (and Spain) had arguably the greatest central midfield ever assembled...certainly the best at playing keep ball, meaning the backline was rarely called upon. Without that midfield though, a Pep team can be exposed (his Bayern side getting mauled in the CL, his Man City side losing 5-1 over two legs in the CL to the RS). As I said, Pep’s teams, never great defensively. No CL final appearance in almost a decade for him since Xavi and Iniesta took him there.
The Arsenal “invincibles” with their 12 draws and Pires diving for one of those. Again, similar to Pep, emphasis on attack. Soft underbelly. Routinely dumped out of the CL at the last 16 stage. Wenger inherited George Graham’s well drilled defence, which allied with his great attacking nous gave him the foundation for his first two league titles. For the defensive bedrock of the third and last one, Sol Campbell on a free came gift wrapped. He got away with a midfielder in Lauren playing in defence, not in the CL though. For the next 15 years he showed himself incapable of creating a solid defensive unit.
None of the United teams of the 90s I’d put in the same class of this Liverpool team, Pep’s City or ‘04 Arsenal, certainly not the early ones when the PL was largely just made up of domestic players and managers unlike today. Winning the league with 78 points where your challengers were the tactical might of Roy Evans, “I’d love it’ Keegan, big fat Ron, Howard Wilkinson etc. No wonder Fergie pissed it, during which time he got schooled by Cruyff (4-0 hiding stands out), Lippi, Hitzfeld and Capello in the CL. Fergie vs Klopp, Pep and co is a different ball game to Evans, Keegan, Fat Ron et al. The best United side was 2008, but it would need to be combined with the late 90s midfield to get Fergie’s best XI.
Statistics and trophies say this RS side is the best from these isles (certainly in the PL era). Mentioned before but they have so many similarities with AC Milan of the early 90s, RS last three seasons, 1.CL Finalists, 2.CL winners (PL 97 pts), 3.25 PL games unbeaten 24 wins. They haven’t lost a 2 legged European tie in 4 years, and are unbeaten at home in the league since April 2017. Home, abroad, they do it. It’s the same machine like characteristic of that Milan side.
You have to hand it to them, if that was us we'd have been in dreamland now. It is an unreal sequence of results. Klopp is a great manager and with the dip of the other teams they are there at the right time to pick up the pieces.
That should have been us around the time Leicester won the league but instead of improving on the 72 points we spectacularly dropped off.
1. That they are offended by everything and embarrassed by nothing?Of all the records I’ve seen bandied about today, this one stands out for me: