Not really. Why not do our best to get a young, ambitious coach and back him for the long term? Back them through troubled times rather than just sacking them. Would be a better long term approach than taking the responsibility for recruitment a step back from the guy actually playing the players!
Because football has changed immensely since the all powerful manager role evolved from the selection committee. Comparatively speaking football clubs have progressed from a cottage industry to become multi national businesses.
Perhaps the most telling change is the ability of players to move far more freely than they once could. When clubs could hold onto players as long as they liked, they could control their expenditure far more easily and more importantly maintain stability in the side, selling only when they wanted to. This is no longer the case, how often do you hear of a player actually submitting a transfer request now?
Football is truly a global entity now and to function in that environment a club requires a international network of scouts and someone must spend time cultivating associations with the agents and collating the information.
Also managers themselves desire to coach at the highest level, and if successful will leap at the opportunity to step up to an established CL club. I wonder how long Wolves will hang on to theirs should he continue to impress.?
Academies must be managed as well , ideally they should be producing players who can segue seamlessly into the first team and at the least recoup the money invested in them.
All the time a coach spends managing the above is time he should be spending on his primary job training and welding together a team capable of winning trophies.
Nowadays a club needs a quality DoF to provide stability and purpose.
I believe we have one.