Opening with “ the lad is guilty”, what bit have I misunderstood about trial by social media.I'm quite confident it's you that hasn't understood his post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Opening with “ the lad is guilty”, what bit have I misunderstood about trial by social media.I'm quite confident it's you that hasn't understood his post.
Opening with “ the lad is guilty”, what bit have I misunderstood about trial by social media.
No problem with the lad being charged, tried and convicted. Get on with it, surely the evidence will put him awayA recording of him released by his accuser, the transcript of which you can read in this thread, isn't trial by social media. It's evidence.
If this was me you're referring to you've misunderstood the spirit of my post. I wasn't assuming guilt or innocence, for I - like much the rest of social media i suppose - do not know all the facts of the case. However, based on untried evidence I would be reticent to condemn anybody.I mean technically GOT is a form of social media but if you said "hey name a social media platform" no one is saying a footie forum. Regardless, that still doesn't detract from my point.
For someone to come in here and automatically assume someone must be innocent because social media says otherwise is just archaic and sad.
The central witness (his GF) refused to testify, became uncooperative and had a kid with him.No problem with the lad being charged, tried and convicted. Get on with it, surely the evidence will put him away
Sorry this in my opinion is about whether he has already been tried by social media. If it went to court, not sure how he could get a fair trial anyway, which everyone Is entitled to. I am sure his lawyers would have put that to the CPS.The central witness (his GF) refused to testify, became uncooperative and had a kid with him.
No problem. I was just explaining why the CPS left it alone as you spoke about a trial.Sorry this in my opinion is about whether he has already been tried by social media. If it went to court, not sure how he could get a fair trial anyway, which everyone Is entitled to. I am sure his lawyers would have put that to the CPS.
I suspect social media is both a boon and bust to the relevant authorities, great pre-arrest and a pain with leaks after.No problem. I was just explaining why the CPS left it alone as you spoke about a trial.
I would have hoped the CPS would deem it in the public interest to push on anyway.
My point was, that if he wants to "ply his trade" and behave like a misogynistic arsehole, then Saudi is the place where that would be acceptable. No?Being a footballer is such a privileged job, it shouldn’t just be a case of him packing up and going to another country to ply his trade. As a sport collectively clubs, sponsors and the industry need to turn their back on him. What message does it send to young boys looking up to their role models. Do what you like because there’s absolutely no comeback. Or worse yet what message does it send to women, even in your relationships you aren’t safe and as a society we won’t protect you from one of your most basic fears. Infact not only will we not protect you we’ll continue to celebrate the guy that did it to you.
You seem very quick to let everyone know you’re too cool to keep up with the facts of a case, but then leap in with claims of false allegations made against wealthy men that ruin lives.Seriously? Hard? I honestly have more interesting pursuits than trawling through celebrity gossip. Its not hard to distance yourself from the baying rabble .
Seemingly he’ll get to do it here mate. No doubt there’ll be some fresh updates on the United takeover situation shortly after it’s announced he’s staying, and he’ll be out of the news cycle and in the clear.My point was, that if he wants to "ply his trade" and behave like a misogynistic arsehole, then Saudi is the place where that would be acceptable. No?
No, the sentence there for it is public flogging or deathMy point was, that if he wants to "ply his trade" and behave like a misogynistic arsehole, then Saudi is the place where that would be acceptable. No?
My point was, that if he wants to "ply his trade" and behave like a misogynistic arsehole, then Saudi is the place where that would be acceptable. No?