Eagle Eye
Player Valuation: £5m
It's 100% relevant, you said he must be good if he played for England, I showed you that that measurement is clearly not a smart one. By your definition, Phil Neville is a good player, and certainly better than Keane.
Then in my opinion you know nothing about football. Of course Phil Neville was a good player.
Measurement? You want to talk about measurent? Of the 30 million male population in this country, to be deemed the best player in his position even for one game, let alone 10 games is the pinnacle of what any person can achieve. That means at that time, someone has deemed there is no one better than you in your country in doing what you do.
You are belittling England caps - they are not easily won as your Howard Kendall argument shows.
So yes, Michael Keane must be good to have played for his country, so would Phil Neville and Carlton Palmer have been to do the same. Who was better at what and why is a totally different debate.
Howard Kendall was definitely good, but never quite deemed the best in his country at the time he played. Doesn't make him better or worse than the players you mention. It just means he never reached the pinnacle of his playing career..