What a lot of people are concerned about NOW, is when we might need to take a strategic pause and have a stock-take on our capacity to absorb more. Some might argue that we've already reached that point.
Those same people would probably have had no objections to accepting the needy until the point is reached that they feel over-crowding and/or a drain on resources is taking its toll. For a great many people, they've reached that point. For genuine refugees fleeing death, destruction etc. there should always be some way we can accommodate them. But many people are saying that we can't blithely carry on accepting economic migrants.
I just want to know if there's a point when your own moral compass is re-calibrated.
The above isnt my over-riding concern in all of this - I'm only trying to stimulate the debate through what I'm hearing and being told by people I live, work and socialise with. My main concern is keeping tabs on who is coming out of those conflict zones, and trying to keep some semblance of tabs on them. I firmly believe we should pro use refuge for genuine cases, but we should be doing so in conjunction with as much control as possible for everyone's sake - including those who are hoping to find safety from said bad guys.